MRP: Possible new primary sources

Possible new primary sources

Editorial history

21/08/11, CSG: Created page
02/01/12, CSG: Added hyperlinked index

---

---

Who is in the index

The index below lists fifty-nine merchant individuals, who were commercially active at some time in the 1650-1669 period.

Most of them were subscribers to the Smirna Venture Joint Stock and/or the King Fernandez Joint Stock, with which George Oxenden and his brother Christopher Oxenden were associated. Others have known commercial links to the Oxenden family or to the more commercially prominent of the subscribers to the two above mentioned joint stocks

---

How to use the index

• Select a merchant individual you are interested and use the hyperlinked text to move to a list of Chancery cases which may involve that merchant individual, and/or near members of his family

• The Chancery cases are listed in ascending order of National Archive catalogue code

• Items in bold are probably or definitely matches to the named merchant individual, or to a closely related member of his family (e.g. son, brother, or widow) (50% chance of a match, or better)

• Items in normal text may be matches to the named merchant individual, or to a closely related member of his family (e.g. son, brother, or widow) (25-30% chance of a match, or better, but below a 50& chance)

These probabalistic judgments are offered cautiously, and are based on various qualitative criteria:

- Is the case marked Middlesex?

• • Increases likelihood that it is a commercial case

- If the case is for a county away from London, is the county one associated with the named merchant individual?

- Is the case marked "money matters"?

• • Increases likelihood that it is a commercial case

- Does the index record indicate an attached schedule, and if so, is the description a commercial one?

- Does the index record include a known merchant, either as plaintiff or defendant?

• • Increases likelihood that the case is a commercial one

---

---

Sir Robert Abdy & family

Court of Chancery

C 6/125Pt1/50 Short title: Fairfax v Abdey. Plaintiffs: John Fairfax, Robert Gardiner, Charles Therold, Lambert Pitches and Hugh Forth. Defendants: Robert Abdy. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1654
C 6/573/2 Short title: Abdy v Fairfax. First plaintiff: Abdy. Defendants: Fairfax. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 10/18/67 Jacobson v Cambell, Abdy, Dewitt and Hill: Notts 1653
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653 ORDERED 18/08/11 12.41
C 10/33/37 Cambell & Abdy bart, v Massingbird, Andrewes, Eastwicke, Moyer, and others: Middx 1651
C 10/52/6 Robert Abdy and others v James Wych: money matters. Demurrer 1659
C 10/54/7 Robert Abdy, George Smith, Edward Kempe and others v James Wych: money matters. Answer 1659 (Document is unorderable)

C 22/915/25 Smith v Abdy baronet & others Between 1558 and 1714

---

Edward Backwell

Edward Backwell (b. c.1618, d.1683) was a prominent London goldsmith banker.

Court of Chancery

C 5/113/13 Backwell v. Povey: Middlesex 1694
C 5/117/5 Backwell v. Povey 1695
C 5/442/27 Backwell v. Hodgkins: Middlesex 1666

C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/187/22 Short title: Backwell v Lydcot. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcot. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1668
C 6/187/25 Short title: Backwell v Lydcote. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcote, Sir John Bankes baronet, Augustine Coronell, John Penrice and John Culling. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, five answers. 1668
C 6/189/12 Short title: Backwell v Tyringham. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: William Tyringham, Joseph Radcliffe, John Walker, Alexander Hurlston, Humphrey Hurlston, Isaac Hurlston, Thomas Hurlston and others. Subject: manor of Tyringham, Buckinghamshire. Document type: bill, seven answers. 1669
C 6/215/63 Short title: Knipe v Backwell. Plaintiffs: Edward Knipe. Defendants: Edward Backwell. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1674
C 6/220/12 Short title: Backwell v Maynard. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Edward Maynard and Thomas Rudyard. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1676
C 6/220/13 Short title: Backwell v Huniades. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: John Huniades and Thomas Rudyard. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1676
C 6/588/48 Short title: Backwell v Backwell. First plaintiff: Backwell. Defendants: Backwell. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 9/30/10 Backwell v. Burridge 1672
C 9/241/143 C 9/241/143 1658
C 9/411/123 Squire v. Backwell 1667

C 10/72/88 Mary Leigh widow and Edward Backwell v Charles Kerr Earl of Ancram: copyhold held of the manor of Richmond, Surrey. Bill and answer 1663
C 10/90/77 Giles Lidcott v Edward Backwell: money matters. Answer 1669
C 10/103/94 William Lovett and Edward Backwell v Henry Toplady: money matters. Answer 1667
C 10/108/28 Crumwell, knight, Chichley, Backwell & Wormell v. Russell, bart & Phillipps: 1668
C 10/154/15 Backwell v. Rivers, Hide, Wharton: Middx 1670
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
C 10/167/7 Backwell v. Squire: Middx 1667
C 10/209/50 Mountney v Backwell, Whittingham, Dalton, Hind, Kirwood and others: Middlesex 1681
C 10/231/21 Exeter, Cranmer, Humble, Oxinden, Blackburne v. Backwell, Mountrey, Snagg, Morris: Middx 1689
C 10/465/164 Jarrard v. Taylor, Backwell and Sherston: Middx 1657
C 10/478/58 Godden v. Tyringham and Backwell: Buckingham 1670
C 10/489/107 William Lovett and Edward Backwell v John Deboys and Charles Hearle: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1666

C 22/205/42 Wortley v. Backwell. 1683
C 22/588/16 Backwell v. Wortley. Between 1558 and 1714

E 133/94/64 Owen v Backwell Eliz. - Victoria
E 133/143/3 The Crown v. Backwell Eliz. - Victoria
E 134/25Chas2/East22 Thomas Bodly v. Sir John Shaw, Sir Robt. Viner, Sir Edmd. Emner, Edwd. Backwell, Fras. Millington.: Thos. Russell, appointed by defendants (farmers of H.M. Customs) collector of customs and subsidies in the port of Southampton. Touching his sureties, viz. 25 Chas 2
E 406/20 Backwell 1676-1701
E 407/8/179 A general account of the interest and allowances due by the king to Edward Backwell for loans advanced 1669 June 24

SP 46/97/fo 98-99 Warrant for payment of £6,210 to Edward Backwell, goldsmith, for his relinquishment of land at Hampton Court. Signed by Henry Lawrence, President of the Council. Backwell's receipt; 13 March 1653/4. 1653/4 Mar. 10
SP 46/102/22 Orders and warrants from council of state: to trustees for sale of king's, queen's and prince's lands to pay John Backwell £1,900 for his interest in part of Hampton Court. ff. 31, 32 1654 February 20
SP 89/12 The account as it stood when Parry took the collection over from Mr. Pollexfen, Alderman Backwell's deputy. 1671

AO 1/848/1 Roll 1 E. Backwell. 1662

---

Sir Henry Barnard

Court of Chancery

C 6/196/9 Short title: Barnard v Willoughby. Plaintiffs: HENRY Barnard. Defendants: Francis Willoughby, Emma Willoughby his wife and Francis Lacon. Subject: property in Ivington, Herefordshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1671

C 10/160/5 Sir Joseph Ash baronet v Christopher Dodsworth, Mary Dodsworth, Henry Barnard, Francis Mose and John Jewkes: Twickenham, Middx 1669
C 10/165/7 Sir John Ash baronet v Christopher Dodsworth, Mary Dodsworth widow, Henry Barnard, Francis Mose and John Jewkes: Twickenham, Middx. Answer 1669

---

Alexander Bence the elder, the younger, and family

Court of Chancery

C 6/184/13 Short title: Benzee v Bence. Plaintiffs: John Baptista Benzee and John Bueno Guipponi. Defendants: Sir Alexander Bence kt, John Penrice, Richard Adams, Robert Shaw, Alexander Milborne, Dame Jane Mico and others. Subject: money matters. Document type: bill, answer. 1669
C 6/187/19 Short title: Benzee v Bence. Plaintiffs: John Baptista Benzee and John Bueno. Defendants: Sir Alexander Bence kt, John Penrice, Richard Adams and Robert Shawe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1669

C 10/2/55 Walter Garfoot and Elizabeth his wife, and Francis Comyn and Mary his wife v Thomas Jaggard and Elizabeth his wife, Alexander Bence and Bence Johnson: personal estate of Bence Johnson, deceased, of Limehouse, Middx. Bill, answer and schedule 1649

E 115/49/24 Certificate of residence showing Squire Bence to be liable for taxation in Middlesex, and not in (county unknown), the previous area of tax liability. (Any information not given in this certificate comes from its old pouch, no 2569.) 1642
E 115/50/30 Certificate of residence showing Alexander Bence to be liable for taxation in Middlesex, and not in (county unknown), the previous area of tax liability. (Any information not given in this certificate comes from its old pouch, no 2569.) 1642
E 214/380 Parties: Governor, Wardens, Assistants and Fellows of the Society of Coal Merchants trading to Newcastle, Sunderland, Blyth, Nook and Berwick, and Thomas Horth, Squyer Bence, Edmund Morgan and others (named) Charles I Place or Subject: Surrender of Letters Patent of 2 July 14 Charles I, incorporating the Society and licencing them to purchase coal; and of deed of the same date whereby the Society covenanted to supply coal to the cities of London and Westminster and their suburbs at a fixed price. 5 May 1641

---

Jeremy Blackman senior & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/418/46 Blackman v. Rayney: Middlesex 1666
C 5/529/53 Nicholls v. Blackman: Middlesex. 1666
C 5/386/159 Trafford v. Blackman: Middlesex. 1652

---

Sir Thomas Bludworth & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/49/54 Hunlocke v. Bludworth: Derby. 1666
C 5/443/58 Bludworth v. Swallow: Middlesex 1666

C 6/182/17 Short title: Foyle v Eyre. Plaintiffs: Robert Foyle. Defendants: John Eyre and Sir Thomas Bludworth kt. Subject: marriage agreement, Hampshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1668
C 6/280/8 Short title: Bludworth v Moore. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Bludworth, Dame Mary Moore and Edward Moore. Defendants: Sir John Moore and Francis Moore. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer, schedule 1682
C 6/318/7 Short title: Bludworth v Scot. Plaintiffs: Bartholomew Bludworth. Defendants: Benjamin Scot. Subject: ship insurance, London. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1700

C 10/66/37 Congrave v. Bludworth, knight, Jolliffe, Barnardiston, Nathaniel, Poulter, and others: Middx. 1662
C 10/66/45 Davis v. Bludworth,Jolliffe, Barnardiston, Poulter: Middx 1662
C 10/66/78 Harvey v. Bludworth, Jolliffe, Barnardiston, Poulter: Middx 1662
C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston
C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
C 10/473/33 Chaplin, knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx. 1670

(and a few more)

---

Christopher Boone & family

Court of Chancery

C 2/ChasI/B55/31 Short title: Boone v Robinson. Plaintiff: Boone. Defendant: Robinson and others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. 1625-1660
C 2/ChasI/B81/53 Short title: Boone v Lenthall. Plaintiff: Boone. Defendant: Lenthall. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. 1625-1660
C 2/ChasI/B151/47 Short title: Boone v Fenne. Plaintiff: Boone. Defendant: Fenne. Document type: Bill only. 1625-1660

C 5/447/121 Boone v. Beddingfield: Middlesex 1671
C 5/24/5 Kendall v. Boone: Middlesex. 1656

C 6/171/17A Short title: Boone v Williams. Plaintiffs: Christopher Boone. Defendants: Milborne Williams and Martha Williams. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, replication, affidavit. 1658
C 6/571/118 Short title: Duckett v Boone. First plaintiff: Duckett. Defendants: Boone. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 9/30/19 Boone v. Blackwell 1663
C 9/97/16 Upton v. Boone 1688

C 10/136/4 Boone, Upton, Bathurst, Haswell, Eyles v. Beeke: Middx 1679
C 10/482/28 Boone, Uppton, Bathurst, Haswell, Wyles, Randall v. Wilkinson, Cole, Beake, Midge, Allinson, Parker: Middx 1679
C 10/218/17 Gosfreight v. Upton, Champney and Boon: Middlesex 1684
C 10/437/40 Anne Lant widow v Thomas Lant, Matthew Lant and John Lant: London, Lime Strut, Middlesex. Two bills and answer AND Thomas Lant, Matthew Lant and John Lant v Andrew Lant, Sir Stephen White knight, Christopher Boone, Nathaniel Letten, Richard Young, Rowland Wynn and others: Thorpe Underwood manor, Northamptonshire 1673 and 1674
C 10/26/12 Thomas Boone, John Upton and Thomas Stronge v William Coward: copyhold held of the manor of Wells, Somerset 1658

---

Thomas Bromfield & family

Court of Chancery

---

Edwin Browne & family

Court of Chancery

---

Nicholas Buckeridge & family

See biographical profile of Nicholas Buckeridge

C 5/80/10 Short title: Buckeridge v Roberts. Plaintiffs: Edmund Buckeridge. Defendants: Robert Roberts and another. Subject: money matters, London or Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1685
C 5/148/130 Short title: Buckeridge v Brooks. Plaintiffs: Edmund Buckeridge, Joyce Buckeridge his wife, and others. Defendants: Elizabeth Brooks widow. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1692
C 5/442/77 Buckeridge v. East India Company, Governor, &c. of: Middlesex 1671
C 5/444/1 Buckeridge v. Skinner: Middlesex 1664
C 5/449/73 Buckeridge v. East India company, Governor, &c. of.: Middlesex 1679
C 5/114/10 Short title: Cornwell v Buckeridge. Plaintiffs: Francis Cornwell and others. Defendants: Edmund Buckeridge. Subject: property in Chidden in Hambledon, Hampshire. Document type: answer only. 1694
C 5/471/31 Deering v. Buckeridge: Middlesex. 1683
C 5/525/40 Moore v. Buckeridge: Middlesex. 1680

C 6/198/100 Short title: Trist v Buckeridge. Plaintiffs: Mary Trist widow. Defendants: Edmund Buckeridge. Subject: money matters, Herefordshire. Document type: bill, two answers, schedule. SFP 1671
C 6/256/27 Short title: Glover v Curteis. Plaintiffs: Henry Glover. Defendants: John Curteis, Richard Anderson and Edmund Buckeridge. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1686
C 6/279/113 Short title: Torquett v Cary. Plaintiffs: James Torquett. Defendants: Elizabeth Cary, Sir Thomas Worsop, Edmund Buckeridge and Thomas Gilbert. Subject: property in St Christophers Alley, Moorfields, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1683
C 6/304/16 Short title: Buckeridge v Buckeridge. Plaintiffs: Edmund Buckeridge. Defendants: Joyce Buckeridge, John Loder, Thomas Carpenter, Mary Arnold, William Bowers and Philip Lea. Subject: land in Chiding in Hambledon [Chidden], Hampshire. Document type: bill, two answers. 1694
C 6/609/37 Short title: Buckeridge v [unknown]. First plaintiff: Edmund Buckeridge. Defendants: [unknown]. Document type: bill only. 1700

C 10/93/67 East India co. v. Mathew, Buckridge, Bagnall, Payne, Browne: Middx
C 10/107/34 Curtis & Buckeridge v. Harvey alias Mildmay 1668
C 10/483/180 John Lloyd v Sir Richard Anderson knight, Richard Anderson, John Curtis, John Loder, Edmund Buckeridge and Joyce his wife and others: Hampstead Norris, Berkshire. Bill only 1681

C 22/912/22 Buckeridge v. Skinner's Company. Between 1558 and 1714 1660

---

Thomas Burnell & family

Court of Chancery

C 4/39/49 Henry Wyllughby v. Thomas Burnell and John Burnell: replication Date of document: Sixteenth century 1501 Jan 1 - 1600 Dec 31
C 4/39/105 Robert Upcott and his wife Agnes v. Walter Burnell, John Burnell senr. and John Burnell junr.: replication Date of document: Sixteenth century 1501 Jan 1 - 1600 Dec 31

C 5/379/23 Burnell v. Burnell: Middlesex, &c. 1650

---

James Clitherow & family

Court of Chancery

---

John Colvill(e), goldsmith

Court of Chancery

C 5/458/4 Cade v. Colvile: Middlesex 1673
C 5/463/78 Colvile v. Gray: Middlesex 1674
C 5/480/51 Fenne v. Colvile: Middlesex. 1673
C 5/488/58 Gomeldon v. Colvile: Middlesex. 1672
C 5/520/89 Manning v. Colvill: Middlesex. 1671
C 5/610/84 Hampton v. Colvile: Middlesex. 1673
C 5/610/85 Hampton v. Colvile: Middlesex. 1674

C 6/210/67 Short title: Roberts v Colville. Plaintiffs: Gabriel Roberts. Defendants: Dorothy Colville, John Colville and Robert Bowes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1673
C 6/213/42 Short title: Gomeldon v Colvile. Plaintiffs: William Gomeldon. Defendants: Dorothea Colvile. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1674

C 9/127/23 Fenn v. Colville 1677

C 10/153/20 Bence, Crispe, Colvile, Hoare, Warring, Graves v. Hnyvett, Saywell: Middx 1670
C 10/470/94 Maynard v Colvile, Portman, Cutler, Royle and Bradford: Middlesex 1670

---

George Cock(e)

Large number of Cock(e) Chancery documents in 1650s and 1660s, but hard to separate out those with good probability of relating to George Cock8e), the London merchant

Court of Chancery

C 2/ChasI/C29/5 Short title: Cock v Hoare. Plaintiff: Cock. Defendant: Hoare. Document type: Bill only. 1625-1660

C 5/598/125 Cocks v. Maynard: Middlesex 1644

C 6/36/20 hort title: Cock v Nuthall. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Penella Nuthall , [unknown Scott], and others. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, demurrer. 1669
C 6/36/21 Short title: Cock v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cock and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1670
C 6/52/16 Short title: Cock v Cuttance. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Sir Roger Cuttance kt. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 6/52/17 Short title: Cock v Mathewes. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Thomas Mathewes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1672
C 6/200/11 Short title: Cock v Nuttall. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Penella Nuttall widow. Subject: money matters Document type: answer only. 1669
C 6/201/21 Short title: Cocke v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cocke and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1670
C 6/201/25 Short title: Cock v Vanderhoeve. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: John Baptista Vanderhoeve and George Matson. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1670

C 202/39/2 Return of Writs: Newcastle-on-Tyne - Certiorari, executors of Cock v. Tempest 1655 1655 East.

C 9/22/37 Cocke v. Pearle 1660
C 9/228/51 Cock v. Pearle 1659
C 9/228/48 Cock v. Pipley 1661
C 9/24/39 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/48 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/47 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/26/40 Cock v. Pixley 1661
C 9/228/178 Pixley v. Cock 1661
C 9/405/32 Cock v. Meade 1659
C 9/407/128 Heathcocke v. Cocke 1660
C 9/409/267 Pixley v. Cock 1662

C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
C 10/178/34 Cocke v. Pearle: Middx. 1660
C 10/468/40 Cock v. Pexley: Middx. 1660
C 10/99/150 Pixley v Cocke 1663

C 22/371/6 Heathcock v Cock. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Robert Cranmer & family

Robert Cranmer died c. 1666

Court of Chancery

C 3/439/91 Short title: Cranmer v Harward. Plaintiffs: Robert Cranmer. Defendants: William Harward and others. Subject: property in Windlesham and Cobham, Surrey. Document type: bill only. 1651

C 5/376/23 Cranmer v. Harward 1651
C 5/386/30 Cranmer v. Hereward: Surrey 1652
C 5/387/113 Harward v. Cranmer: Surrey. 1650
C 5/467/27 Cranmer v. Hampson: Surrey 1673
C 5/600/78 Cranmer v. Hooker: Surrey 1668

C 10/35/57 Conway v. Ayleworth, Pennoyer, Borneford, Somersley & Cranmer: Warw. 1655
C10/72/23 Bornfold v. Andrewes, Winter, Edwards, Cranmer, Tomlins: Middx 1661
C 10/98/2 Thomas Andrewes, Thomas Winter, James Edwards and Thomas Tomlyns v Jane Bornford and Robert Cranmer: money matters, Middx 1663
C 10/474/57 Cranmer & Hampson: Surrey 1674
C 10/486/52 Cranmer v. Hampson: Surrey 1676

---

Nicholas Cooke & family

Court of Chancery

---

Augustine Coronell

C 6/46/110 Short title: Goodyer v Coronell. Plaintiffs: Hester Goodyer and others. Defendants: Augustine Coronell. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1661
C 6/187/25 Short title: Backwell v Lydcote. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcote, Sir John Bankes baronet, Augustine Coronell, John Penrice and John Culling. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, five answers. 1668

---

William Cutler & Thomas Cutler (William's son)

Court of Chancery

C 5/407/169 Cutler v. Alleyn: Middlesex 1664
C 5/468/109 Cutler v. Howland: Middlesex 1670
C 5/468/111 Cutler v. Justice: Middlesex 1669
C 5/54/40 Ford v. Cutler 1668
C 5/24/62 Pride v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1652
C 5/404/285 Robinson v. Cutler 1647
C 5/53/78 Sowton v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1669

C 6/218/65 Short title: Sowton v Cutler. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Thomas Cutler and David Clarke. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, three schedules. 1676
C 6/227/80 Short title: Sowton v Westland. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Oliver Westland and Thomas Cutler. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1677
C 6/584/205 Short title: Warren v Cutler. First plaintiff: Warren. Defendants: Cutler. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/597/21 Short title: Cutler v Colvel. First plaintiff: Cutler. Defendants: Colvel. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/599/55 Short title: Cuttler v Sowton. First plaintiff: Cuttler. Defendants: Sowton. Document type: bill, schedule. [1649-1714]
C 6/602/75 Short title: Cutler v Howland. First plaintiff: Cutler. Defendants: Howland. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 9/9/21 Cutler v. Wynard 1652
- Is "Wynard" a TNA transcription error for "Maynard"?
C 9/27/57 Elliott v. Orlibeare and Cutler 1662
C 9/410/111 Rich v. Cutler 1656

C 10/53/22 Billingsley v. Foote, Cutler: Middx 1659
C 10/59/39 Cutler v. Copping: Middx. 1660
C 10/72/122 Page v. Cutler: Middx 1661
C 10/73/45 Everard v. Cutler: Middx 1663
C 10/74/18 Cutler v. Parkhurst, knight, Abdy, bart, Maynard, knight, Stowell & Mills: Middx. 1663
C 10/98/19 Cutler v. Page: Middx. 1663
- Have checked John Paige letters (BHOL) for references to Cutler, but the published Paige letters are only for the years 1648-1658.
C 10/108/85 Keate v. Cutler: Middx 1664
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
- See Transcriptions C10/155/38 f. 1, C10/155/38 f. 2, C10/155/38 f. 3
C 10/158/28 Cutler & Goodwin v. Travers & Howland: Middx. 1670
C 10/472/21 Browne v. Cutler: Middx 1667
C 10/472/22 Browne v. Cutler: Middx 1667
C 10/472/96 Heath v. Cutler, Morris, Cleyton, Stampe, Yates, Chapman and Beddard: Ireland 1667
C 10/475/162 John Lloyd v William Cutler, Jeremy Carter and William Gomeldon: St. Peter le Poer, London, Middlesex. Bill only 1670

C 22/597/10 Bathurst v. Cutler. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Francis Dashwood & family

Court of Chancery

C 3/454/94 Short title: Muggins v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: Edmund Muggins. Defendants: Francis Dashwood. Subject: money matters in Middlesex. Document type: [pleadings]. 1642-1660
C 3/462/39 Short title: Stanley v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: John Stanley and Joan Stanley his wife. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, [Gibbon] and others. Subject: money matters, merchandisein Middlesex. Document type: bill only. 1652

C 5/468/4 Crome v. Dashwood: Middlesex 1671
C 5/54/33 Dashwood v. Speereing: Middlesex. 1669
C 5/64/26 Dashwood v. Halstead: Middlesex. 1672
C 5/469/81 Dashwood v. Whitley: Middlesex. 1675
C 5/469/82 Dashwood v. Woods: Middlesex. 1675
C 5/531/55 Nowell v. Dashwood 1669

C 6/19/9 Short title: Browne v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: Quarles Browne and Francis Maynell. Defendants: Francis Dashwood and Martha Dashwood his wife. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Nathaniel Tems, of LondonDocument type: answer only. 1660
C 6/19/85 Short title: Keightley v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: William Keightley. Defendants: Francis Dashwood. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Nathaniel Tems.Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/66/80 Short title: Wainwright v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: James Wainwright. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, John Ireton and Elizabeth Ireton his wife. Subject: property (not specified), in Middlesex. Document type: plea. [1625-1714]
C 6/183/1 Short title: Acton v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: Edward Acton and Elizabeth Acton his wife. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, William Justice, Thomas Hale, Margaret Hale his wife, John Dawson and Eleanor Dawson his wife and others. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Edward Elton, of Norfolk. 1668
C 6/209/92 Short title: Waynwright v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: James Waynwright. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, Nathaniel Letten, John Letten, Peter Kesterman and Chrisostom Hamilton. Subject: money matters, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 6/241/106 Short title: Dashwood v Ashton. Plaintiffs: Francis Dashwood. Defendants: Thomas Ashton, Richard Wright and John Wright. Subject: property in Mere, Knutsford (unidentified), Cheshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1682
C 6/259/40 Short title: Hale v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: Thomas Hale. Defendants: Sir Samuel Dashwood kt and Francis Dashwood. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Edward Eltonhead, of Kent, and Essex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1687
C 6/577/19 Short title: Dashwood v Thorold. First plaintiff: Dashwood. Defendants: Thorold. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/602/20 Short title: Browne v Dashwood. First plaintiff: Browne. Defendants: Dashwood. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 10/14/157 Thomas Scott v Francis Dashwood: money matters, Middx 1651
C 10/60/30 William Love, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Martin Nowell, Francis Dashwood and others v George Oxinden, Jane Noke widow and Elizabeth Dalison: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1660
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx 1664
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx.
C 10/472/91 Hodipp v. Hilliard and Dashwood: Middlesex 1658
C 10/489/110 John Leigh v Francis Dashwood and Francis Bridgman: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1667
C 10/473/131 Noell v. Robinson, Dashwood, Blake and Noell: Middx 1669

---

Robert Dawes & family

C 142/655/108 Dawe, Arthur: Gloucester 2 Charles I.

C 5/403/92 Dawes v. Lumley: Gloucester. 1650
C 5/404/75 Dawes v. Lumley 1652
C 5/470/48a Dawes v. Mohun 1674

C 6/151Pt2/28 Short title: Moudiford v Greaves. Plaintiffs: James Moudiford, Robert Dawes, Jonathan Dawes, William Rider, John Portman and Philip Scarth. Defendants: Abraham Greaves, Sarah Greaves his wife and Richard Hutchinson. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: answer only. 1659
C 6/209/87 Short title: Turney v Dawes. Plaintiffs: Anthony Turney. Defendants: Abraham Dawes, Arnold White and William Moyer. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, three schedules. 1673
C 6/211/17 Short title: Crundall v Dawes. Plaintiffs: Thomas Crundall. Defendants: Abraham Dawes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1673
C 6/597/96 Short title: Porter v Dawes. First plaintiff: Porter. Defendants: Dawes. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 10/107/17 Brandon v. Erisey, Bendish, Dawes, Riccard, Boscower: Middx 1666
C 10/463/40 Cox v. Dawes: Middx. 1652
C 10/87/18 Dawes v. Riccard, Evans, Penning, Heatley: Middx 1668
C 10/110/25 Dawes v. Salmount, Brunker, Leake, Dolbin, Jenkinson, Eastwood: Glos 1667
C 10/165/35 Erisey v. Bendish, Dawes, Buckman 1663
C 10/105/136 Painter, Pennell and Noke v Morley and Dawes 1671
C 10/106/148 Painter, Pennell and Noke v Dawes and Morley: Middlesex 1671
C 10/107/112 Parris v Dawes: Middlesex 1672
C 10/59/16 Bolle, Andrewed, Modyford, Holworthy, Dawes v. Canham, Thompson, Rives, Bellamy: Middx 1660
C 10/65/86 William Love v Jonathan Dawes: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and three answers 1662

C 22/619/27 Dawes v. Dawes. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Simon Delboe & family

Court of Chancery

C 3/431/29 Short title: Allen v Delboe. Plaintiffs: Anne Allen widow. Defendants: Simon Delboe. Subject: apprenticeship matters. Document type: answer only. SFP 1659

C 6/163/68 Short title: Oxinden v Love. Plaintiffs: George Oxinden and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: William Love, Thomas Pearle, Thomas Bretton, Simon Delboe and Edward Peirce. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, replication. 1663

C 10/60/30 William Love, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Martin Nowell, Francis Dashwood and others v George Oxinden, Jane Noke widow and Elizabeth Dalison: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1660
C 10/87/49 William Lore, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Peirce, James Clitherow and others v Sir George Oxinden knight and Thomas Atkins: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and demurrer 1668
C 10/108/90 Mary Long widow v Simon Delbo: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1664
C 10/173/72 William Love, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Pearce, James Clitherow and others v Sir Henry Oxinden knight and James Oxinden: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1670
C 10/466/4 Allen v. Delboe: Middx 1659
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662

C 22/347/21 Delboe v Butler. 1660

---

Daniel Edwards

Court of Chancery

C 6/178/51 Short title: Robinson v Edwards. Plaintiffs: Timothy Robinson and Rebecca Robinson his wife. Defendants: Daniel Edwards and Paul Priaux. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1666
C 6/239/31 Short title: Olgar v Edwards. Plaintiffs: David Olgar. Defendants: Daniel Edwards and Thomas Quick. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1680

C 9/130/84 Edwards v. Astry 1665

C 10/72/23 Bornfold v. Andrewes, Winter, Edwards, Cranmer, Tomlins: Middx 1661
C 10/82/32 Edwards v. Hoare: Middx 1666
C 10/98/41 Edwards v. Hoare, Gibbons: Middx 1666
C 10/98/46 Gardner v. Edwards, Gardner and Ford: Middlesex 1663
C 10/100/4 Benett, Brownlow, Smith v. Ford, Low, Edwards, Leake, Smith: Devon 1662
C 10/101/30 Corsellis v. Alexander, Edwards, Maynard, and others: Middx. 1664
C 10/473/122 Maynard v Prujean, Gorges, Stanley, Pearse, Edwards: Southampton 1670

---

Goodlad(d) family of mariners

C 5/396/66 Goodlad v. Withers 1653
C 5/17/192 Withers v. Goodlad: Surrey. 1653

C 6/230/48 Short title: Goodlad v Whitebread. Plaintiffs: Timothy Goodlad widow. Defendants: Thomas Whitebread, William Harcoat, Edward Micoe, Henry Nevill, John Mordaunt and Barbara Mordaunt his wife. Subject: money matters, Bedfordshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1678

---

Samuel(l) Heron

Samuel Heron was servant to Sir William Ryder, and following Ryder's death a merchant in his own right, closely linked to the Royal Africa Company

Court of Chancery

C 5/160/7 Fagg v. Heron: Middlesex. 1695
C 5/289/48 Pilkington v. Heron: Middlesex. 1697
C 5/498/37 Heron v. Long: Middlesex. 1668
C 5/498/43 Heron v. Fremlin: Middlesex. 1677
C 5/424/67 Heron v. Killigrew: Middlesex. 1683
C 5/599/23 Cooke v. Heron: Middlesex 1695
C 5/611/83 Heron v. Freeman: Middlesex. 1673
C 5/624/45 Pilkington v. Heron: Middlesex. 1698

C 6/91/46 Short title: Rustat v Heron. Plaintiffs: John Rustat clerk. Defendants: Samuel Heron. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Tobias Rustat.Document type: answer only. 1698
C 9/413/220 Heron v. Robinson 1677
C 9/437/128 Rustat v. Heron 1698

C 10/106/92 Heron v. Nevill, Ayloffe 1671
C 10/192/42 Heron v. Bransby: Middlesex 1677

C 22/652/53 Heron v. Fotherby. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/653/30 Heron v. Fotherby. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/656/43 Heron v. Fotherby Between 1558 and 1714

---

Thomas Hodges

Court of Chancery

C 6/240/52 Short title: Thornborough v Hodges. Plaintiffs: William Thornborough and Rebecca Thornborough his wife. Defendants: John Hodges and Paul Priaulx. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Thomas Hodges, of Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1673
- But Thomas Hodges will is PROB 11/258 Berkeley 313-362 Will of Thomas Hodges, Merchant of London 29 September 1656

C 10/16/162 Robert Tanner v Thomas Hodges: money matters, Middlesex 1652

---

Sir Mathew Hollworthy & family

Court of Chancery

C 3/447/151 Short title: Holworthy v Holworthy. Plaintiffs: Mary Holworthy widow. Defendants: Matthew Holworthy and others. Subject: money matters in Gloucestershire. Document type: [pleadings]. SFP 1642-1660

C 5/410/122 Holworthy v. Wych: Middlesex. 1654
C 5/410/123 Holworthy v. Drawater: Middlesex. 1659
C 5/381/131 Lounce v. Holworthy 1651
C 5/386/97 Launce v. Holworthy 1651

C 10/59/16 Bolle, Andrewed, Modyford, Holworthy, Dawes v. Canham, Thompson, Rives, Bellamy: Middx 1669

C 22/370/57 Holworthy v Dethyck. Between 1558 and 1714

E 134/3&4Chas1/Hil3 Sir William Waller, knight, Abell Kitchen, John Guy, Richard Holworthy v. Francis Derrick, Edward Ballhashe.: Prisage of wines coming to the Port of Bristol from St. Mallowes (St. Malo), in the year 1626. Of what vintage? &c., &c.: Bristol 3 & 4 Chas 1

---

John Jolliffe & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/411/34 Leman v. Jolliffe: Middlesex, &c. 1663

C 6/181/68 Short title: Stint v Jolliffe. Plaintiffs: Henry Stint. Defendants: John Jolliffe and Benjamin Alleyn. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1668

C 10/66/37 Congrave v. Bludworth, knight, Jolliffe, Barnardiston, Nathaniel, Poulter, and others: Middx. 1662
C 10/66/45 Davis v. Bludworth,Jolliffe, Barnardiston, Poulter: Middx 1662
C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
C 10/66/78 Harvey v. Bludworth, Jolliffe, Barnardiston, Poulter: Middx 1662
C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, barnardiston
C 10/111/20 Dackombe v. Cole, Jolliffe: Middx 1668
C 10/112/29 Knight v. Jolliffe: Ireland 1664

C 10/467/91 Dethicke, Jolliffe v. Leigh: Middx 1650
- John Jolliffe's sister Anne Jolliffe married into the Dethicke family (see PROB 11/362 Bath 1-59 Will of John Jolliffe of London 15 January 1680 )

---

George Kendall & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/24/5 Kendall v. Boone: Middlesex. 1656

C 6/84/23 Short title: Modyford v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Charles Modyford. Defendants: Thomas Kendall. Subject: money matters.Document type: answer only. 1676
C 6/125Pt1/53 Short title: Farley v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Alexander Farley. Defendants: George Kendall, Thomas Williams, Oliver Williams and Thomas Paris. Subject: money matters, Surrey. Document type: bill, two answers.
C 6/133/228 Short title: Williams v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Oliver Williams. Defendants: George Kendall, Thomas Paris, Thomas Williams and Alexander Farley. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, schedule. 1656
C 6/216/67 Short title: Modyford v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Charles Modyford. Defendants: John Kendall, Margaret Burch, Thomas Kendall, James Kendall and John Kendall. Subject: property in Duloe, Cornwall. Document type: bill, answer. 1674
C 6/218/46 Short title: Modyford v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Charles Modyford. Defendants: Thomas Kendall. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1675
C 6/610/52 Short title: Kendall v Clayton. First plaintiff: Kendall. Defendants: Clayton. Document type: bill only. [1649 - 1714]

C 9/5/116 Kendall v. Thompson 1650
C 9/72/45 Modiford v. Kendall 1678

C 10/105/76 Faldo v. Kendall, Morris & Ellams: Middx. 1671
C 10/175/85 Kendall v. Harvey: Middx 1673
C 10/189/45 Modyford v Kendall: Cornwall 1676
C 10/193/72 Modyford v Kendall: Middlesex 1676
C 10/31/109 Kendall v. Best and Mead: Devon 1648
C 10/52/119 Kendall, Paris v. Farley 1656
C 10/101/6 Thomas Andrewes and Daniel Skinner v John Kempthorne, Thomas Kendall, Walter Hampson, Robert Cunning, Gervace Cook and others: money matters, Middx 1662

C 22/124/28 Modyford v. Kendall. Between 1558 and 1714

---

James Lane & family

Court of Chancery

---

John & Nathaniel Letten

C 5/585/65 Letten v. Hungeford: Middlesex. 1670
C 5/572/36 Wainwright v. Letten 1673

C 6/36/21 Short title: Cock v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cock and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1670
- See C6/36/21 f. 1 ((Bill of complaint exhibited in 1670 by George Cock vs John Letten & Thomas Hobart re. chartering of the William to Guinea and "Islands in America")
C 6/54/19 Short title: Letten v Harbord. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwyn Rich kt, Samuel Trotman and Edward Trotman. Defendants: William Harbord, Richard Newman, Roger Gillingham, William Gauntlett and Henry Rumsey. Subject: Durham House in St Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. 1670
C 6/199/62 Short title: Letten v Moresco. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Letten and John Letten. Defendants: Leonora Moresco, Peter Joy and Thomas Townsend. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, demurrer. 1670
C 6/199/66 Short title: Letten v Townsend. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Letten and John Letten. Defendants: Thomas Townsend. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1672
C 6/201/21 Short title: Cocke v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cocke and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1670
C 6/201/81 Short title: Windsore v Gamlyn. Plaintiffs: Richard Windsore. Defendants: Hugh Gamlyn and Nathaniel Letten. Subject: property in St Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1669
C 6/204/47 Short title: Pensax v Crosby. Plaintiffs: Daniel Pensax. Defendants: John Crosby, John Hammond, Thomas Becket, Nicholas Bradley, John Letten, Richard Winkle and others. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1673
C 6/209/92 Short title: Waynwright v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: James Waynwright. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, Nathaniel Letten, John Letten, Peter Kesterman and Chrisostom Hamilton. Subject: money matters, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 6/210/53 Short title: Letten v Bankes. Plaintiffs: John Letten. Defendants: John Bankes, Charles Bankes and William Gilbert. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1674
C 6/221/43 Short title: Goldsborough v Letten. Plaintiffs: Elizabeth Goldsborough, Alexander Goldsborough, Thomas Goldsborough and Nicholas Goldsborough. Defendants: Nathaniel Letten, Rowland Wynn, Richard Adams, Thomas Manley, Thomas Mills, John Looker and another. 1671

C 10/84/27 Hols v. Wynne, Letten, Peri, Adams, Looker: Lincs, Middx, Essex 1667
C10/91/84 f. 1 (Bill of complaint of Nathaniel and John Letten vs. Charles Marescoe re. bill of exchange)
C 10/106/106 Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwin Riche knight, Samuel Trotman, Edward Trotman and others v William Harbord, Richard Newman and Roger Gillingham: St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Answer 1667
C 10/122/67 John Letten v Daniel Pensaxe, John Crosseby, Richard Stephens, John Hamond, Nicholas Bradley and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1673
C 10/156/105 Nathaniel Letten and John Letten v Charles Maresco: money matters, Middlesex. Answer 1670
C 10/159/91 Nathaniel Letten, Peter Mathewes, Isaac Vinch and others v Sir Henry Cambell knight, Robert Sheffield and Dame Mary his wife, John Genew and Rachel his wife and Julius Coningsby: personal estate of Dame Rachel Cambell widow, deceased, of Clay Hall, Essex. 1671
C 10/158/95 Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwin Rich knight, Samuel Trotman, Edward Trotman, Thomas Price, Amos Griggs and others v William Herbert Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery: St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Demurrer 1671
C 10/158/98 Nathaniel Letten and others v William Herbert Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, William Harbord, Richard Newman and others: St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Answer 1670
C10/160/41 f. 1 (Bill of complaint exhibited in ?1671 by Daniel Gates vs. John Letten, the main owner of the Legorne Merchant, and ist captain, David Hamilton)
C 10/161/16 Child v. Coker, Bexly & Letten: Middx. 1671
C 10/163/67 Nathaniel Letten and John Letten v Peter Joy and Leonora Marescoe widow: money matters. Two answers 1671
C 10/165/70 Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwin Rich knight, Samuel Trotman, Edward Trotman, Thomas Prince, Amos Grigg and others v William Herbert Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, George Villiers Duke of Buckingham, John Pwalett Lord Pawlett, John Cosin Bishop of Durham, William Harbord and others: St. 1670
C 10/174/67 Nathaniel Letten, John Letten and Gerard Vanheithinson v John Palgrave and Diana his wife: Ebony manor and others, Kent. Bill and three answers 1673
C 10/177/57 Nathaniel Letten and John Letten v George Blackbourne: East Smithfield, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1674
C 10/182/43 Nathaniel Letten and others v William Cavendish Lord Cavendish: Ebony manor and others, Kent. Answer 1676
C 10/183/50 Nathaniel Letten and others v Thomas Browne: Ebony manor and others, Kent. Answer 1676
C 10/191/30 Huxley, Tryan and Hadley v. Trussell, Huxley, Letten, Ent: Southampton and Middlesex 1677
C 10/206/2 African v. Vyner, Bence, Letten: Middx 1679
C 10/272/48 Richard Letten, John Letten, Susannah Letten, Sarah Letten and Elizabeth Letten v John Letten: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1685
C 10/336/7 Baron v. Blanchard, Nichardson, Offley, Letten: Middx 1689
C 10/437/40 Anne Lant widow v Thomas Lant, Matthew Lant and John Lant: London, Lime Strut, Middlesex. Two bills and answer AND Thomas Lant, Matthew Lant and John Lant v Andrew Lant, Sir Stephen White knight, Christopher Boone, Nathaniel Letten, Richard Young, Rowland Wynn and others: Thorpe Underwood manor, Northamptonshire 1673 and 1674
C 10/471/6 Butler v. Vanheythuyson, Letten: Staffs 1669
C 10/475/165 Nathaniel Letten v William Jonas: Catteral, Lancashire. Bill only 1672
C 10/486/120 Nathaniel Letten, John Letten and Gerard Vanheithinson v John Palgrave and Diana his wife, William Cavendish Lord Cavendish, Sir Robert Clayton knight, John Morris and John Browne: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1673

C 111/185 PACKET 11: UNKNOWN CAUSES: Lease of George Barron, John Letten and Thomas Neale to Francis Ligoe of a bakehouse and other buildings in Ratcliff, Middx 1685

---

Edward Lewis & family

Court of Chancery

---

Charles Longland & family

Court of Chancery

C 6/539/101 Short title: Longland v [unknown]. First plaintiff: Charles Longland. Defendants: [unknown]. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

---

William Love

Court of Chancery

C 10/178/71
C 10/185/51
C 10/185/52

C 22/803/14
C 22/803/34
C 22/803/47

---

Luce family

Court of Chancery

C 10/43/131 Luke Luce v Nicholas Searle and George Withers: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1648
C 10/105/106 Jacob Luce, Katherine Santen widow, Anne Beake widow and Solomon Morris v John Norris, John Wood, George Myris and William Watts: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1671
C 10/488/140 Jacob Luce, Paul Santen and Elias Beeke v Francis Norris, Edward Norris, George Miris and William Watts: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1666

---

James Man(n) & family

Court of Chancery

C 9/405/357 Dallison v. Mann 1661

C 22/672/44 Mann v. Jaggard. Between 1558 and 1714

---

William Meggs & family

Court of Chancery

C 10/57/109 Gore, Woodward and Meggs v. East India company, Governor &c. and others 1652

---

Sir Samuel(l) Mico(e) & family

Review of primary sources

There are a large number of Chancery records for the period 1650-1680 which plausibly involve Samuel Mico and/or his relative and factor Aaron Mico, or his widow, Lady Jane Mico. These records do not appear to have been examined by writers on Mico, or the Spanish and Levant trades.

Several of the records following the date of Samuel Mico's decease appear to involve his relative ([Andrew] Barker. Several more of the records pre Samuel Mico's decease appear to involve possible trading relationships or estate matters with merchants such as [?John] Fenn, [?Aaron and/or Alexander Bence], Daniel and Jonathan Andrewes.

There are also published letters addressed to or mentioning Samuel and/or Aaron Mico in collection of correspondence of Richard Houncell.

Court of Chancery

C 2/ChasI/A51/16 Short title: Andrewes v Mico. Plaintiff: Andrewes and others. Defendant: Mico. Document type: Replication. Between 1625 and 1660

C 5/32/3 Andrewes v. Micoe: Middlesex 1657
C 5/37/36 Drawater v. Mico: Middlesex. 1661

C 5/52/63 Mico v. Mico: Middlesex. 1668
C 5/411/133 Micoe v. Bence 1665
C 5/446/127 Bence v. Mico: Middlesex 1669
C 5/446/128 Bence v. Mico: Middlesex 1667
C 5/446/129 Benzee v. Mico: Middlesex 1669
C 5/524/15 Mico v. Gardner: Middlesex. 1651
C 5/524/16 Micoe v. Bence: Middlesex. 1669
C 5/591/53 Bence v. Mico: Middlesex 1667
C 5/620/5 Mico v. Bence: Middlesex. 1664

C 6/146/120 Short title: Micoe v Holworthy. Plaintiffs: Edward Micoe. Defendants: Richard Holworthy. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1659
C 6/118/38 Short title: Campion v Mico. Plaintiffs: Edward Campion. Defendants: Samuel Mico and Hugh Forth. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1653
C 6/184/13 Short title: Benzee v Bence. Plaintiffs: John Baptista Benzee and John Bueno Guipponi. Defendants: Sir Alexander Bence kt, John Penrice, Richard Adams, Robert Shaw, Alexander Milborne, Dame Jane Mico and others. Subject: money matters. Document type: bill, answer. 1669
C 6/214/50 Short title: Mico v Barker. Plaintiffs: Samuel Mico. Defendants: Andrew Barker and William Robinson. Subject: money matters, Somerset. Document type: bill, answer. 1674

C 9/30/83 Mico v. Andrewes and Culling 1663
C 9/45/7 Barker v. Mico 1666

C 10/24/34 Carleton v. Carleton, Micoe & Andrewes v. Oxon. 1653
C 10/24/68 Fenn v. Mico & Cockcroft: Middx. 1654
C 10/51/9 Daniel Andrewes, William Strange, William Murthwaite and Edward Mico v Giovanni Andrea Zanardi, and Francesco Pardini: money matters, Middx 1658
C 10/55/121 Mico v Thwiston: Middlesex 1659
C 10/56/90 Fenn v. Mico 1658
C 10/60/3 Jonathan Andrewes, Thomas Cutting, and Giffard Ball v Samuel Mico: money matters, Middx. Bill and two answers 1660
C 10/75/3 Daniel Andrewes v John Buckworth and Hester his wife, Samuel Mico, Moses Goodyeare, Aaron Goodyeare and Hester Goodyeare: personal estate of Moses Goodyeare, deceased, of London, Middx 1664
C 10/476/28 Brorne v. Mico: Middx 1663
C 10/164/81 Mico v Barker, Robinson, Mordant, STone, Mitchell, Hawkes: Middlesex 1670

C 22/273/48 Mico v Barker. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/284/31 Pennye v Micoe. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/492/6 Fenn v. Micoe. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/783/34 Fenn v. Mico. 1659

---

Sir James Modyford & family

Court of Chancery

C 6/25/117 Short title: Modyford v Berry. Plaintiffs: James Modyford. Defendants: Robert Berry. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: answer only. 1658
C 6/84/23 Short title: Modyford v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Charles Modyford. Defendants: Thomas Kendall. Subject: money matters.Document type: answer only. 1676
C 6/216/67 Short title: Modyford v Kendall. Plaintiffs: Charles Modyford. Defendants: John Kendall, Margaret Burch, Thomas Kendall, James Kendall and John Kendall. Subject: property in Duloe, Cornwall. Document type: bill, answer. 1674

C 9/17/47 Edwards v. Modiford 1653
C 9/72/45 Modiford v. Kendall 1678

C 10/59/16 Bolle, Andrewed, Modyford, Holworthy, Dawes v. Canham, Thompson, Rives, Bellamy: Middx 1660
C 10/193/72 Modyford v Kendall: Middlesex 1676
C 10/473/33 Chaplin, knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx. 1670
C 10/488/141 Sir John Lewis baronet, Sir James Muddiford baronet, Sir George Smith knight, Sir George Oxendon knight, Thomas Hussey and others v Nicholas Millett, William Kennon, George Male, William Stevens, John North, Samuel Roberts and others: money matters, Middlesex. 1665

C 22/124/28 Modyford v. Kendall. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Sir Martin Noell & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/56/57 Noel v. Blake 1670
C 5/58/67 Noell v. Robinson: Middlesex. 1670
C 5/58/68 Noell v. Robinson: Middlesex. 1670
C 5/63/44 Noel v. Robinson: Middlesex. 1671
C 5/63/45 Noel v. Blake: Middlesex. 1671
C 5/381/143 Noell v. Roach 1654
C 5/530/26 Noell v. Blake 1670
C 5/530/28 Noell v. Blake 1672
C 5/531/56 Noell v. Blake: Middlesex. 1670

C 6/36/77 Short title: Upton v Noell. Plaintiffs: Hugh Upton. Defendants: Sir Martin Noell kt and others. Subject: real estate and personal estate Sir Martin Noell kt, of London. Document type: bill, answer. 1668
C 6/64/23 Short title: Blake v Noell. Plaintiffs: George Blake. Defendants: Thomas Noell and George Robinson. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1666
C 6/106/112 Short title: Noell v Wingfeild. Plaintiffs: Martin Noell. Defendants: Thomas Wingfield. Subject: rectory of Wethersfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1640
C 6/136/105 Short title: Noel v Shurlocke. Plaintiffs: Martin Noel and Thomas Gape. Defendants: William Shurlocke, Richard Pillett and Fulke Morris. Subject: property in Southwark, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1656
C 6/147/80 Short title: Maxey v Noell. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Maxey. Defendants: Martin Noell, George Blake and Anthony Phelpes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, demurrer. 1660
C 6/147/168 Short title: Walker v Noell. Plaintiffs: John Walker. Defendants: Martin Noell, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton. Subject: office of collector of the excise on salt in Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1660
C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/159/3 Short title: Amcotts v Perry. Plaintiffs: Vincent Amcotts, William Amcotts, Vincent Lawson and Mary Lawson his wife. Defendants: Augustine Perry, Martin Noell and Hugh Upton. Subject: property in Amcotts, Lincolnshire. Document type: two bills, two demurrers, four answers. 1661
C 6/161/74 Short title: Noell v Lockhart. Plaintiffs: Sir Martin Noell kt. Defendants: William Lockhart, William Wildigos and John Ashurst. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1663
C 6/175/49A Short title: Strange v Haylock. Plaintiffs: Thomas Strange. Defendants: Rebecca Haylock widow and Thomas Noell. Subject: property in St Andrew Undershaft, London. Document type: bill, answer. 1666

C 9/229/52 Noell v. Dallison 1665

C 10/51/11 Bushell v. Vyner, Leake, Noell: Middx 1659
C 10/55/132 Noell, Underwood, Delboe and Taylor v. White and Watkins: Middx 1657
C 10/78/15 Croxton v. Noell, knight, Gerrard, Minshall, Mead, and others: Ches. 1665
C 10/79/19 Croxton v. Noell, knight. 1665
C 10/82/2 Sir Robert Abdy baronet, Sir Thomas Rich baronet, Sir James Madiford baronet, Sir Joseph Ash baronet, Sir Thomas Bludworth knight and others v Sir George Oxenden knight, Sir Martin Noel knight, Thomas Atkins, Elizabeth Dallison and others: money matters, Middx 1664
C 10/109/63 Hewett v. Watts, Bushell, Noell, Bonnell, Rastall, Bicknell: Middx 1663
C 10/469/169 Vincent Lawson clerk v Augustine Perry, Sir Martin Noell knight, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton: Amcott, Lincolnshire. Bill only 1664
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662
C 10/473/131 Noell v. Robinson, Dashwood, Blake and Noell: Middx 1669
C 10/473/135 Noell and Backhouse v. Browne: Middx 1663

C 22/2/26 Amicotts v. Noell. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/945/3 Noel v. Robinson Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/1036/34 Oxenden v. Noel Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/1048/42 Noel v. Cambden Between 1558 and 1714

---

William Noke & family

Court of Chancery

---

Edward Pearce & family

Court of Chancery

---

Thomas Pearle & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/44/70 Pearle v. Williams: Middlesex. 1664

C 6/163/68 Short title: Oxinden v Love. Plaintiffs: George Oxinden and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: William Love, Thomas Pearle, Thomas Bretton, Simon Delboe and Edward Peirce. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, replication. 1663

C 9/22/37 Cocke v. Pearle 1660
C 9/26/18 Baker v. Smyth and Pearle 1660
C 9/228/51 Cock v. Pearle 1659

C 10/60/30 William Love, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Martin Nowell, Francis Dashwood and others v George Oxinden, Jane Noke widow and Elizabeth Dalison: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1660
C 10/75/11 Bulmer, Pearle V. Gerard, Bonnell, Radcliffe: Middx 1664
C 10/87/49 William Lore, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Peirce, James Clitherow and others v Sir George Oxinden knight and Thomas Atkins: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and demurrer 1668
C 10/100/90 Frances Long widow v Sir Andrew Riccard knight, Henry Hunter, Thomas Pearle and others: money matters. Bill and answer 1664
C 10/173/72 William Love, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Pearce, James Clitherow and others v Sir Henry Oxinden knight and James Oxinden: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1670
C 10/178/34 Cocke v. Pearle: Middx. 1660
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662

---

Daniel Pennington

Court of Chancery

C 9/29/127 Pennington v. Harvey 1663
C 9/29/131 Pennington v. Harvey 1663
C 6/232/12 Short title: Stilgoe v Petty. Plaintiffs: Zachary Stilgoe. Defendants: Sir William Petty kt, Matthew Elliston and Daniel Pennington. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1679

---

William Pennoyer & family

Court of Chancery

C 2/ChasI/A13/69 Short title: Andrews v Pennoyer. Plaintiff: Andrews. Defendant: Pennoyer and others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. Between 1625 and 1660

C 3/456/96 Short title: Pennoyer v Goff. Plaintiffs: William Pennoyer. Defendants: Lawrence Goff and others. Subject: money matters in Middlesex. Document type: [pleadings]. 1642-1660

C 6/8/78 Short title: Glover v Pennoyer. Plaintiffs: Rebecca Glover and others. Defendants: William Pennoyer. Subject: money matters.Document type: answer only. sfp 1646
C 6/150Pt2/75 Short title: Pennoyer v White. Plaintiffs: William Pennoyer. Defendants: Elizabeth White. Subject: manor of Acton, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1650

C 9/6/131 Lawrence v. Penoyer 1651

C 10/3/118 William Penoyer v Laurence Brinley and [...] Bull: money matters, Middx 1649
C 10/35/57 Conway v. Ayleworth, Pennoyer, Pennoyer, Borneford, Somersley & Cranmer: warw. 1655
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx 1664

• ORDERED 12/08/11 13.57 Viewed briefly

---

Sir Thomas Piers (alias Peirs)

Court of Chancery

C 6/160/162 Short title: Peirs v Mildmay. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Peirs baronet, Thomas Lake and John Mildmay. Defendants: Sir Humphrey Mildmay kt, Sir Robert Barrington kt, William Herris, Elizabeth Herris widow and Elizabeth Herris. Subject: manors of St Cleres, and Herons, Essex. 1662

---

Samuel Pixley & family

Court of Chancery

C 9/24/39 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/48 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/47 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/26/40 Cock v. Pixley 1661
C 9/228/178 Pixley v. Cock 1661
C 9/409/267 Pixley v. Cock 1662

C 10/99/150 Pixley v Cocke 1663

C 22/237/44 Cox v Pixley. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Nicholas Read

Court of Chancery

---

Sir Andrew Riccard

Court of Chancery

C 5/59/48 Riccard v. Hardy: Dorset. 1670
C 5/420/38 Dethick v. Riccard 1657
C 5/429/54 Pearce v. Riccards: Middlesex. 1668
C 5/448/135 Berkley v. Riccard: Middlesex 1679
C 5/545/4 Riccard v. Moone: Middlesex. 1670

C 6/186/73 Short title: Lewis v Riccards. Plaintiffs: Edmund Lewis. Defendants: Sir Andrew Riccards kt, Edward Lewis, John Greenuffe and Thomas Bucke. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1669

C 9/19/77 Riccard v. Bateman 1655
C 9/35/52 Riccard v. Bateman 1666
C 9/410/77 Ricards v. Pemberton 1666
C 9/451/46 Toriano v. Ricard 1689

C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653 ORDERED 18/08/11 12.41
C 10/87/18 Dawes v. Riccard, Evans, Penning, Heatley: Middx 1668
C 10/100/90 Frances Long widow v Sir Andrew Riccard knight, Henry Hunter, Thomas Pearle and others: money matters. Bill and answer 1664
C 10/107/17 Brandon v. Erisey, Bendish, Dawes, Riccard, Boscower: Middx 1666
C 10/117/45 Gunn Barnardiston, Poulter, Mellish, White and others v. Riccard, Sonning, Love and Prestwood: Middlesex 1667
C 10/152/79 Ken v. Governor, &c. of, East India company, Thompson, Riccard and others: Middx 1669
C 10/155/111 Edmund Lewis v Sir Andrew Riccard knight, Edward Lewis, John Greenuff and Thomas Bucke: money matters. Answer 1669
C 10/217/13 Culham, bart. v. Berkely, Parker, Ricard & Folkes: Middx. 1684
C 10/476/132 Honywood v. Garway, Riccard and Williams: Somerset 1660
C 10/477/103 Gunn, Darmardiston, Palatia, Poulter and others v. Riccards, Penning, Love, Prestwood and Cave: Middlesex 1668

London Metropolitan Archives: Letter from Edward Wood to John Pack. ACC/0262/043/086 1665/6:
- 4) Pack is to approach Sir Andrew Ricard, Sir Wm. Rader and Mr. Maurice Thompson re stopping legal proceedings begun by Mr. Thomas Andrewes, Wood's great adversary and now dead.
- Endorsed: "To Mr. John Pack in thames streete over against Bare Key neere the Costom house."

---

Sir Thomas Rich

Court of Chancery

C 6/28/39 Short title: Halsteed v Rich. Plaintiffs: Laurence Halsteed. Defendants: Sir Thomas Rich baronet. Subject: manors of Sonning, and Eye manor (unidentified), Berkshire. Document type: answer only. 1667
C 6/28/67 Short title: Rich v Chambrelan. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Rich kt. Defendants: Sir Thomas Chambrelan kt. Subject: manor of Sonning, Berkshire. Document type: two answers, schedule. 1665
C 6/130/74 Short title: Fredericke v Barker. Plaintiffs: John Fredericke, Thomas Jennings, Peter Vandepute, Gilbert Keate, Jonathan Keate and Thomas Rich. Defendants: William Barker, Isaac Barton and Elizabeth Barton his wife. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1655
C 6/161/90 Short title: Rich v Chamberlyne. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Rich baronet. Defendants: Sir Thomas Chamberlyne kt, Laurence Halsteed, Mathias Halsteed, Abraham Halsted, Edward Halsteed, Charles Halsted and another. Subject: manors of Sonning, Berkshire, and Eye, Oxfordshire, Yorkshire. 1663
C 6/161/92 Short title: Rich v Halsted. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Rich baronet. Defendants: Abraham Halsted, Matthew Halsted and Laurence Halsted. Subject: manor of Barnoldswick, Yorkshire. Document type: three answers. 1663
C 6/161/93 Short title: Rich v Halsted. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Rich baronet. Defendants: Edward Halsted and Charles Halsted. Subject: manor of Barnoldswick, Yorkshire. Document type: answer only. 1663
C 6/163/49 Short title: Hall v Rich. Plaintiffs: Thomas Hall. Defendants: Thomas Rich baronet, John Harrison and Geoffrey Turtle. Subject: manor of Sonning, Berkshire. Document type: bill, three answers. 1662
C 6/163/76 Short title: Rich v Hall. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Rich baronet, Geoffrey Tottell, Robert Round, John Syms, William Coldrey and Charles Machen. Defendants: Thomas Hall and Anne Lee. Subject: manors of Sonning, Berkshire, and Eye, Oxfordshire. Document type: bill, two answers. 1663
C 6/173/29 Short title: Rich v Chambrelan. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Rich baronet. Defendants: Sir Thomas Chambrelan kt. Subject: manor of Sunning, Berkshire. Document type: answer, two schedules. 1663

C 10/82/2 Sir Robert Abdy baronet, Sir Thomas Rich baronet, Sir James Madiford baronet, Sir Joseph Ash baronet, Sir Thomas Bludworth knight and others v Sir George Oxenden knight, Sir Martin Noel knight, Thomas Atkins, Elizabeth Dallison and others: money matters, Middx 1664

---

Abraham Sayon & family

Court of Chancery

C 10/65/99 Oxinden and Noke v. Sayon 1662

---

Sir George Smith

Court of Chancery

C 5/14/57 Goodere v. Smith: Middlesex. 1652
C 5/25/74 Smith v. Powell: Middlesex. 1656
C 5/26/23 Bathurst v. Smith: Middlesex 1655
C 5/435/34 Walker v. Smith: Middlesex. 1661

C 6/142/119 Short title: Peirson v Smith. Plaintiffs: Thomas Peirson. Defendants: George Smith, Paul Priaulx, Martha Wood, Hugh Wood, Simon Wood, Lewis Wood and others. Subject: property in Bromley, Kent. Document type: bill, answer, replication. 1658
C 6/163/13 Short title: Brereton v Smith. Plaintiffs: Robert Brereton, Theophilus Brereton and Thomas Brereton. Defendants: Sir George Smith kt, Stephen Langham and Dame Rebecca Vincent. Subject: manor of Sonning, Berkshire. Document type: bill, two answers. 1663

C 9/14/215 Smith v. Hodges 1653
C 9/233/180 Robinson v. Smith 1659
C 9/237/251 Smith v. Crispe 1651

C 10/26/1 Robert Abdy, George Smith, William Vincent, Nathaniel Wyer, Thomas Bowyer, John Juxon and others v James Wych: money matters, Kent. Bill and motion 1658
C 10/40/56 Chamberlayne v. Smith: 1653
C 10/49/57 Ent, Smith, Yarway v. Robinson, Rot: Middx 1659
C 10/54/7 Robert Abdy, George Smith, Edward Kempe and others v James Wych: money matters. Answer 1659
C 10/98/84 Mildmay v Smith: Middlesex 1663
C 10/99/70 East India Co. v. Smith, Rider, Wood, Thompson 1661
C 10/111/12 Cholmely v. Smith: Middx. 1666
C 10/488/141 Sir John Lewis baronet, Sir James Muddiford baronet, Sir George Smith knight, Sir George Oxendon knight, Thomas Hussey and others v Nicholas Millett, William Kennon, George Male, William Stevens, John North, Samuel Roberts and others: money matters, Middlesex. 1665

---

Samuell Sowton

Court of Chancery

C 5/53/78 Sowton v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1669
C 5/558/67 Sowton v. Crofts: Middlesex. 1678
C 5/558/68 Sowton v. Ford: Middlesex. 1678
C 5/558/69 Sowton v. Ford: Middlesex. 1678

C 6/97/23 Short title: Deguilder v Sowton. Plaintiffs: Cornelius De Gelder. Defendants: Samuel Sowton. Subject: lands (not specified).Document type: answer only. 1681
C 6/210/70 Short title: Albertsenhooft v Sowton. Plaintiffs: Peter Albertsenhooft. Defendants: Samuel Sowton, John Just, John Strouther and David Strong. Subject: money matters. Document type: bill, answer. 1674
C 6/218/65 Short title: Sowton v Cutler. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Thomas Cutler and David Clarke. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, three schedules. 1676
C 6/220/66 Short title: Sowton v Gray. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Edward Gray. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1676
C 6/223/39 Short title: Sowton v Willimot. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: John Willimot and William Idle. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, two schedules. 1676
C 6/227/79 Short title: Sowton v Botte. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Philip Botte, Abraham Bodens and Peter Herringhooke. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1677
C 6/227/80 Short title: Sowton v Westland. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Oliver Westland and Thomas Cutler. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1677
C 6/252/17 Short title: De Gelder v Holman. Plaintiffs: Cornelius De Gelder. Defendants: John Holman, Joseph Stretch, Samuel Sowton, Hannah Sowton, Sir Nathaniel Powell and Thomas Westerne. Subject: rectory of Staplehurst, Kent. Document type: bill, answer. 1685
C 6/554/81 Short title: Sowton v [unknown]. First plaintiff: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: [unknown]. Document type: bill only. 1681
C 6/599/55 Short title: Cuttler v Sowton. First plaintiff: Cuttler. Defendants: Sowton. Document type: bill, schedule. [1649-1714]
C 6/601/14 Short title: Sowton v Albertsonhoft. First plaintiff: Sowton. Defendants: Albertsonhoft. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 9/109/109 Sowton v. Thorold 1684

C 10/170/81 Pile v Colvile, Sowton, Richards, Harrison and Grantham: Middlesex 1673
C 10/173/84 Pyle and Godfrey v Sowton 1674

C 22/708/33 Sowton v. Hooft. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Henry Spurstow & family

Court of Chancery

C 5/17/113 Owen v. Spurstowe: Middlesex. 1652

C 6/62/37 Short title: Davenport v Spurstowe. Plaintiffs: Edmund Davenport. Defendants: Henry Spurstowe, Sarah Gourdon widow and James Astrey. Subject: money matters.Document type: two replications. 1675

C 10/83/33 Heydon v. Spurstowe, Sherrer: Middx 1652
C 10/90/86 Mayo v Carew, Spurstow and Bosse: Middlesex 1668
C 10/90/92 Mayo v Carew, Spurstow and Bosse: Middlesex 1668
C 10/330/33 Heydon v. Spurstow: Middlesex 1667
C 10/522/9 Heydon v. Spurstow: Middlesex 1666

---

Nathaniel Temms (alias Tems, Temmes)

Court of Chancery

C 5/425/108 Justice v. Temes: Flint. 1651

C 6/19/9 Short title: Browne v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: Quarles Browne and Francis Maynell. Defendants: Francis Dashwood and Martha Dashwood his wife. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Nathaniel Tems, of LondonDocument type: answer only. 1660
C 6/121/88 Short title: Millett v Adams. Plaintiffs: John Millett and Jane Millett his wife. Defendants: William Adams and Nathaniel Temms. Subject: property in Iscoyd, and Fensheath, Flintshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1653

C 10/51/119 Milner and Tems v Campion and Benning: Middlesex 1657

C 22/718/14 Temmes v. Gront. Between 1558 and 1714

---

Maurice Thomson (alias Thompson) & family

C 2/ChasI/B70/7 Short title: Barnard v Thompson. Plaintiff: Barnard. Defendant: Thompson and others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. 1625-1660

C 5/53/81 Thompson v. Byddulph: Middlesex. 1668
C 5/457/5 Bourne v. Thompson: Middlesex 1649

C 6/114/6 Short title: Andrewes v Merchants of London trading into the East Indies, gover. Plaintiffs: Thomas Andrews, Francis Allen, Stephen Eastwick, George Thompson, Samuel Moyer and Maurice Thompson. Defendants: East India Company and others. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. 1651
C 6/145/137 Short title: Penniston v Cockaine. Plaintiffs: Anthony Penniston and Robert Penniston. Defendants: William Cockaine, Thomas Andrews, Morris Thomson, Nathaniel Witch and Aaron Baker. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: answer only. 1656
C 6/172/22 Short title: Crispe v Thompson. Plaintiffs: Sir Nicholas Crispe kt and Ellis Crispe. Defendants: Francis Thompson, Benjamin Andrews, Clement Oxenbridge, William Dickenson and Henry Bishop. Subject: Contract to take over and farm H M Post Offices. Document type: two bills, eight answers, plea, demurrer. 1662
C 6/179/23 Short title: Oldfeild v Appleton. Plaintiffs: Anna Oldfield widow. Defendants: Sir Henry Appleton baronet, Maurice Thomson, John Goodwin and Robert Thomson. Subject: marriage agreement, Lincolnshire. Document type: bill, three answers. SFP 1665
C 6/185/119 Short title: Thompson v Calvert. Plaintiffs: Maurice Thompson. Defendants: Richard Calvert and Edmund Calvert. Subject: manor of Cockerham, Lancashire. Document type: bill, answer. 1667
C 6/601/49 Short title: Thompson v Corselles. First plaintiff: Thompson. Defendants: Corselles. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/601/50 Short title: Thompson v Corselles. First plaintiff: Thompson. Defendants: Corselles. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/187/51 Short title: Goodwyn v Thomson. Plaintiffs: Thomasine Goodwyn. Defendants: Maurice Thomson. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. SFP 1670

C 9/5/116 Kendall v. Thompson 1650

C 10/57/9 Thomas Andrewes, Franics Allen, Stephen Eastwicke, George Thompson, Maurice Thompson and Samuel Moyer v the Governor etc of the East India Company, William Cockayne, William Methwold and John Massingberd: money matters. Answer 1651
C 10/59/16 Bolle, Andrewed, Modyford, Holworthy, Dawes v. Canham, Thompson, Rives, Bellamy: Middx 1660
C 10/69/9 Blancs v. Dethicke, Thompson, Langley, Upton: 1663
C 10/99/70 East India Co. v. Smith, Rider, Wood, Thompson 1661
C 10/152/79 Ken v. Governor, &c. of, East India company, Thompson, Riccard and others: Middx 1669

---

Richard Turgis & family

Court of Chancery

C 3/460/34 Short title: Saunders v Turgis. Plaintiffs: Henry Saunders and others. Defendants: Thomas Turgis. Subject: manors of Bodeleyes, Upgroves and Scarletts in Lambeth, Surrey. Document type: answer only. 1655

C 5/27/96 Saunder v. Turgis: Middlesex. 1657

C 6/185/56 Short title: Horsey v Turgis. Plaintiffs: Hercules Horsey. Defendants: Edward Turgis. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1669
C 6/189/92 Short title: Turgis v Horsey. Plaintiffs: Edward Turgis. Defendants: Hercules Horsey. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1670

---

John White & family

Court of Chancery

---

William Williams

Court of Chancery

C 6/129/224 Short title: Wright v Cockayne. Plaintiffs: Nathan Wright and Thomas Hussey. Defendants: William Cockayne, Thomas Jennings and William Williams. Subject: property in Normanton on Soar, Nottinghamshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1655
C 6/138/225 Short title: Fellowship of English Merchants v Wilson. Plaintiffs: Fellowship of English Merchants, William Williams, and Philip Williams. Defendants: John Wilson, Eleanor Wilson his wife, Stephen Ewer, John Wilson, Eleanor Wilson his wife and Stephen Ewer. 1645

---

Nathaniel Withers (alias Wythers)

Court of Chancery

C 5/18/87 Withers v. Seaman: Middlesex. 1654
C 5/396/182 Withers v. Limbrey 1654
C 5/581/97 Withers v. Morse: Middlesex. 1645
C 5/581/98 Withers v. Withers: Middlesex. 1668

C 6/44/99 Short title: Withers v Knapp. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Withers. Defendants: Thomas Knapp. Subject: assurance policy, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1650
C 6/133/248 Short title: Withers v Sowden. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Withers. Defendants: Hugh Sowden and Jane Sowden his wife. Subject: property in All Hallows Barking, London. Document type: bill, answer. 1656
C 6/607/24 Short title: Marescoe v Withers. First plaintiff: Marescoe. Defendants: Withers. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]

C 9/4/161 Withers v. Craddocke 1650

C 10/18/31 Duncombe v. Withers: Middx 1653

E 115/421/140 Certificate of residence showing Nathaniel Withers to be liable for taxation in London. (Details of which pouch this certificate was removed from are now lost.) 1547-1685
E 115/423/78 Certificate of residence showing Nathaniel Withers to be liable for taxation in London, and not in the half-hundred of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, the previous area of tax liability. (Any information not given in this certificate comes from its old pouch, no 2708. 1640-1641

---

Nathan (alias Nathaniel) Wright(e)

Court of Chancery

C 2/ChasI/B81/53 Short title: Boone v Lenthall. Plaintiff: Boone. Defendant: Lenthall. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. 1625-1660

C 5/5/107 Lenthall v. Ford: Devon. 1649
C 5/32/73 Lenthall v. Middleton: Middlesex. 1656
C 5/390/85 Massey v. Lenthall: Devon. 1651
C 5/40/63 Trott v. Lenthall: Middlesex. 1662

C 6/129/224 Short title: Wright v Cockayne. Plaintiffs: Nathan Wright and Thomas Hussey. Defendants: William Cockayne, Thomas Jennings and William Williams. Subject: property in Normanton on Soar, Nottinghamshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1655
C 6/131/217 Short title: Wright v Wright. Plaintiffs: Sir Benjamin Wright baronet and Ezekiel Wright. Defendants: Nathan Wright, Benjamin Wright and Jane Wright. Subject: property in Maldon, Springfield, Boreham, and Woodham Ferrers, Essex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1655
C 6/140/147 Short title: Wright v Benlowes. Plaintiffs: Nathan Wright. Defendants: Edward Benlowes, Elizabeth Benlowes, Walter Blount and Philippa Blount his wife. Subject: manor of Brentham Justices alias Hawksells (unidentified), Essex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1657

C 10/11/21 Samuel Browninge v Eusebius Wright and Jane his wife: personal estate of William Browninge, deceased, of London, Middx 1650
C 10/18/29 Cowper v. Cockaine, Wright, Bassano and Hare: Staffs 1653
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653
C 10/121/42 Francis Lenthall v Thomas Smith and Nathan Wilson: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and two answers 1669

E 115/434/127 Certificate of residence showing Nathan Wright (or the variant surname: Write) to be liable for taxation in London, and not in the hundreds of Edmonton and Gore, Middlesex, the previous area of tax liability. (Any information not given in this certificate comes from its old pouch, no 443. 1640-1641
E 122/236/14 MISCELLANEOUS. Account of Nathan Wright and Francis Lentall "for 1/10th part more of the present custom and subsidy". 1643-45

---

Christopher Yardley & family

C 6/44/135 Short title: Yardley v Aldworth. Plaintiffs: Christopher Yardley. Defendants: Richard Aldworth. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: answer only. 1660