John Whittingham
John Whittingham | |
---|---|
Person | John Whittingham |
Title | |
First name | John |
Middle name(s) | |
Last name | Whittingham |
Suffix | |
Spouse of | |
Widow of | |
Occupation | Blockmaker |
Secondary shorebased occupation | |
Mariner occupation | |
Associated with ship(s) | |
Training | Not apprentice |
Is apprentice of | |
Was apprentice of | |
Had apprentice(s) | |
Citizen | Unknown |
Literacy | Signature |
Has opening text | John Whittingham |
Has signoff text | John Whittingham |
Signoff image | (Invalid transcription image) |
Language skills | English language |
Has interpreter | |
Birth street | |
Birth parish | |
Birth town | |
Birth county | |
Birth province | |
Birth country | |
Res street | |
Res parish | |
Res town | Rederith |
Res county | Surrey |
Res province | |
Res country | England |
Birth year | 1631 |
Marriage year | |
Death year | |
Probate date | |
First deposition age | 24 |
Primary sources | |
Act book start page(s) | |
Personal answer start page(s) | |
Allegation start page(s) | |
Interrogatories page(s) | |
Deposition start page(s) | HCA 13/70 f.373v Annotate |
Chancery start page(s) | |
Letter start page(s) | |
Miscellaneous start page(s) | |
Act book date(s) | |
Personal answer date(s) | |
Allegation date(s) | |
Interrogatories date(s) | |
Deposition date(s) | Jun 16 1655 |
How complete is this biography? | |
Has infobox completed | Yes |
Has synthesis completed | No |
Has HCA evidence completed | No |
Has source comment completed | No |
Ship classification | |
Type of ship | Shore based trade |
Silver Ship litigation in 1650s | |
Role in Silver Ship litigation | None |
Biographical synthesis
John Whittingham (b.ca.1631; d.?). Blockmaker,
Resident in Rederith in Surrey in 1655.
Married twice. The name of his first wife is unknown. His second wife was Elizabeth Dewell, daughter of Humphry Dewell, merchant, of Rederith, Surrey.[1]
Evidence from High Court of Admiralty
June 1655
Twenty-four year old John Whittingham deposed on June 16th 1655 in the High Court of Admiralty. He was examined on a libel on behalf of Thomas Lash in the case of "Lash against the Relief of London and John Edge her master."[2]
Whittingham stated that he had been in the service of Thomas Lash, who "did travell in blockworke and other requisites".[3] The ship the Relief of London had need of block work, which was delivered by Thomas Lash to John Edge, the ship's master. Whittingham stated that he had delivered the bulk of the goods "with his owne hands" and "entred them from time to time in the said producents shopp booke". The schedule of the disputed goods which Whittingham was shown was extracted from the shop book. The total amount due to Thomas Lash was £14-09 -01d. When John Edge failed to pay for the goods received., Thomas Lash followed the ship to Gravesend, where he confronted Edge, and Edge endorsed the account of goods and materials received by him with his own handwriting.[4]
Whittingham claimed that non-payment for the goods had led to damage of forty to fifty shillings "hee being a tradesman in whose occupation soe much ready money to bee employed to the best advantage might very well produce in such a time a more considerable benefitt."[5]
Comment on sources
1651
C 10/43/129 Edward Lash v Thomas Lash: money matters. Answer. 1651.
Date unclear
"June 4 John Whittingham, of Redrith, Surrey, Blockmaker, Widr, abt 30, & Elizabeth Dewell, Spr, abt 23, da. of Humphry Dewell, of the afsd par., Mercht, who consents; at Stepney, Midd, or (blank)."[6]
The merchant Humphry Dewell is mentioned in a set of High Court of Admiralty interrogatories in a case involving Humphry Dewell, William Warren, John Shorter and Vincent Russlett and a ship named the Saint Joseph, bound from London to Oratava in the Canaries.[7]
1695
- ↑ George J. Armytage, Allegations for Marriage Licences Issued by the Vicar-general of the Archbishop of Canterbury (Canterbury, 1892), p.210
- ↑ HCA 13/70 f.373v
- ↑ HCA 13/70 f.374r
- ↑ HCA 13/70 f.374r
- ↑ HCA 13/70 f.374v
- ↑ George J. Armytage, Allegations for Marriage Licences Issued by the Vicar-general of the Archbishop of Canterbury (Canterbury, 1892), p.210
- ↑ HCA 23/19, item no.72