HCA 13/71 f.80v Annotate
Volume | HCA 13/71 |
---|---|
Folio | 80 |
Side | Verso |
← Previous Page | |
Status | |
Uploaded image; transcribed on 10/09/2012 | |
Note | |
IMAGE: P1130362.JPG | |
First transcriber | |
Janet Few | |
First transcribed | |
2012/09/10 | |
Editorial history | |
Edited on 18/05/2013 by by Jill Wilcox and on 02/05/2014 by Colin Greenstreet |
Contents
[hide]Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
To The Interrogatories [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to be a wittnes in
his cause by the procurement of Mr ffrancis ffowke one of the producents
and saith he never sawe the sayd Mr ffowke but that one tyme when hee required
him to bee a wittnes which was at his house in Minceing Lane London and knoweth him only by sight and saith he knoweth none of
the rest of the parties to this suite and favoureth them all alike and desyreth right
may prevaile And to the rest of the Interrogatorie hee answered
negatively
To the 2 Interrogatorie hee saith hee was Cabbin boy of the Cesar and came
first aboard her in the River of Thames before setting out from
there towards Genoa and soe on the voyage in question, and saith the ship
Cesar and the shipp the Elizabeth and Anne were both together in the road
of Nathalagoe and saith hee knoweth not of any person that was
supra Cargo of the Cesar And further to this Interrogatorie hee can
not answere knowing nothing touching the Agreement Interrogate nor
whether the Interrate hardwick were Supra Cargo of the Elizabeth and
Anne/
To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee referreth himselfe to
his foregoeing deposition to the 37th article of the allegation aforesaid
wherein hee hath satisfied the contents of this Interrogatorie soe
farr as hee can saving hee saith upon perusall of the bill of
ladeing interrogate hee beleeveth the same to be signed
with the proper hand writting of the sayd William ffudge and
further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot answer
[MARKE, LH MARGIN]
To the 4th Interrogatorie hee saith saving his deposition to the 38th article of
the allegation to which hee referreth he can give noe answer to this Interrogatorie
otherwise then negative saving hee saith that the forenamed Aron Estes [?did GUTTER]
marke some of the Currans in question with the marke that was upon [?them GUTTER]
at the deliver (sic) of them in the River of Thames videlicet the marke in the margent/
To the 5th hee saith hee cannot answer otherwise than negatively for his
part for that hee knoweth nothing nor hath heard any thing touching the
matters Interrogatorie./
To the 6th he saith hee neither knoweth nor hath heard any thing to the effect
Interrogate and therefore cannot answer thereto./
To the 7th Interrogatorie hee cannot answer knowing nothing nor having heard any
thing touching the contents thereof nor touching the Schedule in the said Interrogate
mentioned and now shewed unto him nor being acquainted with the Interrogate
harbies hand writing./