HCA 13/71 f.340v Annotate
| Volume | HCA 13/71 |
|---|---|
| Folio | 340 |
| Side | Verso |
| ← Previous Page | |
| Status | |
| Uploaded image; transcribed on 14/11/2012 | |
| Note | |
| IMAGE: P1130844.JPG | |
| First transcriber | |
| Jill Wilcox | |
| First transcribed | |
| 2012/11/14 | |
| Editorial history | |
| Gutter checked on 7/12/2012; edited on 15/05/2014 by Colin Greenstreet | |
Contents
[hide]Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true/
To the Interrogatorries/ [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first hee saith hee is not of Kinne either by blood or allyance to
the Interrogate Roffe and was one of the sayd shipps company under Command
of the sayd Roffe as Master the voyage in question and nyne voyages were next [XXX GUTTER]
that and hath receaved his wages for this and all the other voyages, and hath noe share
in the shipp aforesayd nor her voyage neither will it bee profitt or preiudise
him which way soe ever this cause bee adiudged./
To the second hee saith hee hath satisfied the contents thereof in his foresayd
deposition soe farr as hee can and further cannot answere/
To the 3 hee saith hee knoweth not to whome the goods damnified and left at fflushing
belonged and saith hee beleeveth the reasons why the rest of the sayd shipps laden
was not taken out was for that noe more was discovered to bee damnified
as alsoe for that the winde came fayre for departure and their Convoy was ready
and would have gone away with ather shipps hee had under Convoy and left them
without convoy if they had stayed to unlade their shipp againe to see what
further dammage was happened And further hee cannot depose/
To the 4th hee saith there was two great ffatts laden aboard the
Shipp Interrogate at fflushing which were laden dry as to [?outward GUTTER]
apparance but what they conteyned or to whome they belonged hee
knoweth not and saith when they were unladen at London hee did observe
that they were a little wett on the outside but whether any thing in them
were damnified hee knoweth not And further cannot
depose/
To the 5th hee saith the shipp Interrate after shee beame leakie as
aforesayd stayed at fflushing about two or three dayes and saith shee
had some Crosse windes and boisterous weather in her passage to
London but not such as to make her shipp any water nor did shee shipp
any but continued stanch and strong and fitt to carrie Merchants good
and soo still is And further hee cannot answere/
To the 6th and 7th hee saith hee knoweth none of the Owners of the sayd shipp
nor what parts of her they have, but hath knowne the shipp for about
these sixe yeares last past, and saith hee never know her leakie during
all the tyme hee served in her saving for the in [XXXX]hance aforesayd
of which shee was presently mended and continuous still stanch and
strong And further hee cannot answere/
Repeated the 18th of August before Colonell Cock
the marke of the sayd
Nicholas [MARKE] Kinge./ [MARKE, RH SIDE]
*******************************
The 18th day of August 1656./
Winchurst and Younge against Andrews}
Smith Suckley}
Examined on an allegation on behalfe of the sayd
winchurst and Yonge./
jus
John Sau[?ra]ker of the parish of Stepney Mariner
twenty seven yeares or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and
examined saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet./
To the first article of the sayd allegation hee saith that hee this deponent
[XXX GUTTER]
