HCA 13/70 f.396r Annotate
| Volume | HCA 13/70 |
|---|---|
| Folio | 396 |
| Side | Recto |
| ← Previous Page | |
| Status | |
| Uploaded image; transcribed on 23/11/2014 | |
| Note | |
| IMAGE: IMG_0405.JPG | |
| First transcriber | |
| Colin Greenstreet | |
| First transcribed | |
| 2014/11/23 | |
Contents
[hide]Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
for them they were worth two hundred and forty or fifty
Dollars besides the charges upon the whole, And that this
Rendent was presemt when the Scarlett interrate was payd
or delivered in hand unto Salomon Bashaw, who was the
Owner of the Currance that were taken away out of the
said boate, And further referring himselfe to his former
deposition he cannot answeare./
To the eighth Interrogatory he answereth that the Bashaw is not
the Owner and Proprietor of all the Currance that growe on
the Morea, and that he Bashaw being in the last yeare
1644 the Great and sole Collector of all taxes and dutyes due
to the Grand Signeour the said Bashaw would have and had
the selling of all the said Currance of the Country, to furnish
himselfe therby with moneys to supply the grand Signeours
occasions, And further he cannot answeare
To the nineth Interrogatory he answereth that the Bashaw interrate
hath power (as he beleiveth) to graunt severall [?licenses] to
severall persons to buy and transporte Currance at the
Morea, And to the rest he answereth negatively.
To the tenth Interrogatory he answereth that he knoweth
the interrate henry Page, who was intertayned in the Morea
by Mr Richard Middleton the late Consull as his servant
to keepe his bookes and write his Letters, but he saith that
he never knew that he the said Page ever bought or traded in Currance
To the eleaventh Interrogatory he answereth that there was noe man
ought to have had any of the last yeares Currance in the
Morea but the factors or Agents of the said Tayler and
Company. according to the bargaine or contract predeposed of
but he saith that he hath heard that the interrate Page did gett
into his possession some of the Petras Currance detayned
by the said ffowekes meanes, from the producents factors
And otherwise he cannot answeare.
To the twelfth Interrogatory he answereth that in the bargaine of
the Currance interrate the presents that was given are not
reckoned in part of payment of the money contracted for
the buying of the said Currance./
To the thirteenth he answereth that the shipp interrate departed
from Petras on the nineth of October last, and that the
said shipp stayed at Petras not above 3 or fower dayes
after the Currance was taken away.
To the fourteenth Interrogatory he answereth that there was 89
piggs of Lead in the sayd shipp, which might have bin sold
with profitt at the Morea, and alsoe some money, And
further he cannot answeare.
To the fifteenth Interrogatory he answereth that the Currance
were lose (sic) in the boate at the tine they were taken away.
To the 16th he referreth himselfe to his former deposition
To the seaventeenth Interrogatory he answereth negatively, And
that he never heard any thing therof
To the eighteenth Interrogatory he answereth that he referreth himselfe
to his deposition made to the first article of the allegation And
further cannot answeare.
To the 19th Interrogatory he answerereth that he is not acquainted with
the customes of any other places n Turkey more then of the
Morea, where he saith that he never knew but that the Merchants
ffactors doe first apply themselves to the Consull or Vice Consull
and
