HCA 13/70 f.256v Annotate
| Volume | HCA 13/70 |
|---|---|
| Folio | 256 |
| Side | Verso |
| ← Previous Page | |
| Status | |
| Uploaded image; transcribed on 08/01/2015 | |
| Note | |
| IMAGE: IMG_0122.JPG | |
| First transcriber | |
| Colin Greenstreet | |
| First transcribed | |
| 2015/01/08 | |
Contents
[hide]Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
shipp the ffortune of the sea, and that the arlate Mr
Philip Richaut and Company were the lawfull Owners
and Proprietors of her and her tackle, apparrell and furniture
for that this deponent hath for the accompt of the arlate
Philip Richaut laden and unladen goods aboard her, But
he saith that in the moneths arlate he the deposnent was sent
on a voyage to sea, yet that he hath since well understood
by aadvice that the articulate shipp was in or about the
moneths articulate imployed and sett out on a voyage to
Roane in ffrance by and for the accompte of the sayd Richaut
and Company the Owners of her and that she did
safely arrive then And further he cannot depose.
To the third, fourth and fifth articles he deposeth and
saith That he the deponent hath bin aboard the arlate
shipp the ffortune now called the Post since her
comming into the River of Thames and since she was arrested
at the suite of the Owners arlate, and that by his
this deponents having bin often on board her before she
went her voyage to Roane, and by his having bin aboard her
since her now comming into this River and her arrest there
he well knoweth that the said shipp soe arrested and since released
by Mr Barrs putting in of bayle, is the very same shipp
formerly called the ffortune of the sea, and belonging
unto the said Philip Richaut and Company, And
further he cannot depose.
To the last he saith his former deposition is true./
To the Interrogatoryes. [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first Interrogatory he answereth that he commeth
to be a wittnes by the meanes of Mr Peter Richaut and Company And
to the resdt he answereth that he referreth himselfe to
his former deposition and otherwise negatively.
To the second Interrogatory he knoweth not to answeare.
To the third Interrogatory he answereth that he never saw any
money payd for the shipp interrate, but he hath seene the
accompt of Mr Abraham Vanderhoven a Merchant
whereby he chargd the said Mr Peter Richaut and CompaNny
with the money payd for the sayd shipp And further
he knoweth not to answeare./
Repeated before Doctor Clerke./
John [?XXXX] [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
****************************
On the 12th of ffebruary 1654. [CENTRE HEADING]
Pottgreene and others against}
Crumpe. Clements Smith}
Upon the articulate allegation given in and
admitted on Crumpes behalfe the 29th of
January 1654.
1)
John Barrett of the parish of Allhallowed Barking London
a Wayter at the Customehouse of which parish he hath
bin about 8. or 9. yeares past , aged about [?40]
yeares a wittnes sworne and examined he deposeth
as followeth.
To
