Difference between revisions of "MRP: 12th March 1665/66, Letter from James Master to Sir GO"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''12th March 1665/66, Letter from James Master to Sir GO''' | |
− | BL, MS. 40,708 - 40,713, vol | + | BL, Add. MS. 40,708 - 40,713, vol. 235, year 1665, ff. 22-23 |
'''Editorial history''' | '''Editorial history''' | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
15/12/11, CSG: Created page & posted transcription to wiki | 15/12/11, CSG: Created page & posted transcription to wiki | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | __TOC__ | |
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Abstract & context== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | ==Suggested links== | |
See [[MRP: 6th April 1663, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Canterbury|6th April 1663, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Canterbury]] | See [[MRP: 6th April 1663, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Canterbury|6th April 1663, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Canterbury]] | ||
Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | ==To do== | |
(1) Check whether this transcription is complete against physical manuscript at BL & add foliation to transcription | (1) Check whether this transcription is complete against physical manuscript at BL & add foliation to transcription | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | ==Transcription== | |
'''This transcription may have been completed, but required checking''' | '''This transcription may have been completed, but required checking''' | ||
− | [BL, MS. 40,708 - 40,713, vol | + | [BL, Add. MS. 40,708 - 40,713, vol. 235, year 1665, ff. 22-23] |
[IS THERE NO GREETING?] | [IS THERE NO GREETING?] | ||
− | Since XXXX to yo:w of the 10:te instant I have received these papers from London to connveigh unto yo:w one is a coppy of yo:w answer to my Aunt Dalysons<ref>Elizabeth Dallison</ref> Bill, for Y:w being an adventurer in that stock, we were forced to make yo:w a Defendant, by this yo:w will see the scope of X bill & what yo:w have answered, according to which yo:w are to answer the Questions y:e Commission:s putt unto yo:w but they may & will putt sev:ll others to yo:w which must be relating to the Differences & matter in Question, but yo:w are not to answere any questions concerning yo:r selfe, by which you doo or may accuse your Selfe or do yo:r Selfe any prejudice, yet I would not have yo:w too wary & scrupulous in anything not of moment as to yo:r selfe) least they take to advantadge of it, & so gaine a new Commission to delay two yeares more after these the Commissions to examine yo:w are, Will:m Jesson & Mathew Gray, named for my Aunt, & Gerard Aungier & Anth: Smith are Commissioners for y:e Defendants & fourteen daies notice must be given by the their Commission:s to my Aunts Commission:s, of the day, time of the day, & place of examination X my Aunts Commission:s must acquaint yo:w w:th it though I suppose yo:w will have notice, & ??service from the other Commission:s for the ?most I must referr yo:w to my former letter & the pticulars therein which I desred yo:w to consider of, which may in pte putt yo:w in mind of the circumstances of that ?caise, The other paper is a copy of the order by which the Commission ?ffinds for yo:w examination by which one Jos. Hynmors is allso to examined, but where he is now, or how he will be examined I know not, lett them looke to y:t he was in England since this case began, & lately might have been examined whilst he was here if they had pleased as wee made it appeare to the Court & then they stood upon yo:w as a materiall Witness, I have no more to add but that all relations & friends are well except Aunt Dalyson at London & we hope she will amend, my Service speake to M:r Goodier<ref>John Goodyear (alias Goodyer(e), Goodier) was in Surat with Sir George Oxenden</ref> & all relations & acquaintance I am | + | Since XXXX to yo:w of the 10:te instant I have received these papers from London to connveigh unto yo:w one is a coppy of yo:w answer to my Aunt Dalysons<ref>Elizabeth Dallison</ref> Bill, for Y:w being an adventurer in that stock, we were forced to make yo:w a Defendant, by this yo:w will see the scope of X bill & what yo:w have answered, according to which yo:w are to answer the Questions y:e Commission:s putt unto yo:w but they may & will putt sev:ll others to yo:w which must be relating to the Differences & matter in Question, but yo:w are not to answere any questions concerning yo:r selfe, by which you doo or may accuse your Selfe or do yo:r Selfe any prejudice, yet I would not have yo:w too wary & scrupulous in anything not of moment as to yo:r selfe) least they take to advantadge of it, & so gaine a new Commission to delay two yeares more after these the Commissions to examine yo:w are, Will:m Jesson<ref>William Jesson was XXXX</ref> & Mathew Gray,<ref>Mathew Gray was XXXXt</ref> named for my Aunt, & Gerard Aungier<ref>Gerard Aungier was XXXX</ref> & Anth: Smith<ref>Anthony Smith was XXXX</ref> are Commissioners for y:e Defendants & fourteen daies notice must be given by the their Commission:s to my Aunts Commission:s, of the day, time of the day, & place of examination X my Aunts Commission:s must acquaint yo:w w:th it though I suppose yo:w will have notice, & ??service from the other Commission:s for the ?most I must referr yo:w to my former letter & the pticulars therein which I desred yo:w to consider of, which may in pte putt yo:w in mind of the circumstances of that ?caise, The other paper is a copy of the order by which the Commission ?ffinds for yo:w examination by which one Jos. Hynmors<ref>Joseph Hynmors was XXXX. See [[MRP: Missing faces|Missing faces]]</ref> is allso to examined, but where he is now, or how he will be examined I know not, lett them looke to y:t he was in England since this case began, & lately might have been examined whilst he was here if they had pleased as wee made it appeare to the Court & then they stood upon yo:w as a materiall Witness, I have no more to add but that all relations & friends are well except Aunt Dalyson at London & we hope she will amend, my Service speake to M:r Goodier<ref>John Goodyear (alias Goodyer(e), Goodier) was in Surat with Sir George Oxenden</ref> & all relations & acquaintance I am |
S:r | S:r | ||
Line 41: | Line 43: | ||
March 12th 1666 | March 12th 1666 | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | ==Notes== | |
"[in 1668/69] Mr Goodier, Mr. Master, and Mr. Cotes, Members of the Council at Surat"<ref>John Bruce, ''Annals of the Honourable East India Company'' (London, 1810), p. 240</ref> | "[in 1668/69] Mr Goodier, Mr. Master, and Mr. Cotes, Members of the Council at Surat"<ref>John Bruce, ''Annals of the Honourable East India Company'' (London, 1810), p. 240</ref> | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Possible primary sources== |
Revision as of 22:28, January 3, 2012
12th March 1665/66, Letter from James Master to Sir GO
BL, Add. MS. 40,708 - 40,713, vol. 235, year 1665, ff. 22-23
Editorial history
10/09/08, CSG: Completed transcription
15/12/11, CSG: Created page & posted transcription to wiki
Contents
Abstract & context
Suggested links
See 6th April 1663, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Canterbury
See 10th March 1665/66, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Langden Abbey
See 25th March 1665/66, Letter from James Master to Sir GO, Langden Abbey
To do
(1) Check whether this transcription is complete against physical manuscript at BL & add foliation to transcription
Transcription
This transcription may have been completed, but required checking
[BL, Add. MS. 40,708 - 40,713, vol. 235, year 1665, ff. 22-23]
[IS THERE NO GREETING?]
Since XXXX to yo:w of the 10:te instant I have received these papers from London to connveigh unto yo:w one is a coppy of yo:w answer to my Aunt Dalysons[1] Bill, for Y:w being an adventurer in that stock, we were forced to make yo:w a Defendant, by this yo:w will see the scope of X bill & what yo:w have answered, according to which yo:w are to answer the Questions y:e Commission:s putt unto yo:w but they may & will putt sev:ll others to yo:w which must be relating to the Differences & matter in Question, but yo:w are not to answere any questions concerning yo:r selfe, by which you doo or may accuse your Selfe or do yo:r Selfe any prejudice, yet I would not have yo:w too wary & scrupulous in anything not of moment as to yo:r selfe) least they take to advantadge of it, & so gaine a new Commission to delay two yeares more after these the Commissions to examine yo:w are, Will:m Jesson[2] & Mathew Gray,[3] named for my Aunt, & Gerard Aungier[4] & Anth: Smith[5] are Commissioners for y:e Defendants & fourteen daies notice must be given by the their Commission:s to my Aunts Commission:s, of the day, time of the day, & place of examination X my Aunts Commission:s must acquaint yo:w w:th it though I suppose yo:w will have notice, & ??service from the other Commission:s for the ?most I must referr yo:w to my former letter & the pticulars therein which I desred yo:w to consider of, which may in pte putt yo:w in mind of the circumstances of that ?caise, The other paper is a copy of the order by which the Commission ?ffinds for yo:w examination by which one Jos. Hynmors[6] is allso to examined, but where he is now, or how he will be examined I know not, lett them looke to y:t he was in England since this case began, & lately might have been examined whilst he was here if they had pleased as wee made it appeare to the Court & then they stood upon yo:w as a materiall Witness, I have no more to add but that all relations & friends are well except Aunt Dalyson at London & we hope she will amend, my Service speake to M:r Goodier[7] & all relations & acquaintance I am
S:r
Yo:r humble Nephew & Servant
James Master
March 12th 1666
Notes
"[in 1668/69] Mr Goodier, Mr. Master, and Mr. Cotes, Members of the Council at Surat"[8]
Possible primary sources
- ↑ Elizabeth Dallison
- ↑ William Jesson was XXXX
- ↑ Mathew Gray was XXXXt
- ↑ Gerard Aungier was XXXX
- ↑ Anthony Smith was XXXX
- ↑ Joseph Hynmors was XXXX. See Missing faces
- ↑ John Goodyear (alias Goodyer(e), Goodier) was in Surat with Sir George Oxenden
- ↑ John Bruce, Annals of the Honourable East India Company (London, 1810), p. 240