Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.107r Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
|Transcription=knowledge that the said shipp did goe  out upon the sayd voyage in
 
|Transcription=knowledge that the said shipp did goe  out upon the sayd voyage in
the moneth of May 1653. But whether
+
the moneth of May 1653. But whether there were att that tyme
 +
any Ambassadors there in England upon a treaty of peace to be had
 +
betwixt England and holland he doth not att present remember
 +
but he well remembreth that att that tyme there wes much talke
 +
and great hopes of a Peace soone after to ensue betwixt the
 +
sayd two Commonwealths, and further he cannot depose.
 +
 
 +
To the 2. article of the sayd allegation he saith, the said Pibus did goe forth
 +
upon the sayd voyage upon a fishing designe to Graenland to return
 +
to this Port of London, in the employment of certayne merchants and
 +
was obliged to have a certayne
  
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 14:12, October 17, 2014

[Expand]

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.

Image

HCA 13/70 f.107r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

knowledge that the said shipp did goe out upon the sayd voyage in
the moneth of May 1653. But whether there were att that tyme
any Ambassadors there in England upon a treaty of peace to be had
betwixt England and holland he doth not att present remember
but he well remembreth that att that tyme there wes much talke
and great hopes of a Peace soone after to ensue betwixt the
sayd two Commonwealths, and further he cannot depose.

To the 2. article of the sayd allegation he saith, the said Pibus did goe forth
upon the sayd voyage upon a fishing designe to Graenland to return
to this Port of London, in the employment of certayne merchants and
was obliged to have a certayne