Difference between revisions of "MRP: New work on primary documents"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The acquisition of primary documents involves imaging the documents digitally where possible, followed by their summary and possible transcription. Digital images are held offline, unless otherwise noted and the licence conditions with the holders of the original documents permit. Some summaries and transcriptions have been posted to this wiki as examples of document types. | The acquisition of primary documents involves imaging the documents digitally where possible, followed by their summary and possible transcription. Digital images are held offline, unless otherwise noted and the licence conditions with the holders of the original documents permit. Some summaries and transcriptions have been posted to this wiki as examples of document types. | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | '''Tuesday, 13th September 2011''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Identified a new Chancery document involving Sir Thomas Piers in dispute with Sir George Theobald. Contains interrogatories and deposition of Lady Margaret Oxenden. Involves dispute over legal fees for serjeant-at-law Robert Hatton, who is connected with Theobald | ||
| + | * C22/299/32 Theobald v Peeres Between 1558 and 1714 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Having now viewed C 4/59/46 [-] and Thomas Stone v. [-] Hellinge: answer Date of document: Seventeenth century 1601 Jan 1 - 1700 Dec 31 have concluded that this document is not relavant | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Friday, 9th September 2011''' | '''Friday, 9th September 2011''' | ||
Revision as of 19:53, September 13, 2011
New work on primary documents
The acquisition of primary documents involves imaging the documents digitally where possible, followed by their summary and possible transcription. Digital images are held offline, unless otherwise noted and the licence conditions with the holders of the original documents permit. Some summaries and transcriptions have been posted to this wiki as examples of document types.
Tuesday, 13th September 2011
Identified a new Chancery document involving Sir Thomas Piers in dispute with Sir George Theobald. Contains interrogatories and deposition of Lady Margaret Oxenden. Involves dispute over legal fees for serjeant-at-law Robert Hatton, who is connected with Theobald
- C22/299/32 Theobald v Peeres Between 1558 and 1714
Having now viewed C 4/59/46 [-] and Thomas Stone v. [-] Hellinge: answer Date of document: Seventeenth century 1601 Jan 1 - 1700 Dec 31 have concluded that this document is not relavant
Friday, 9th September 2011
Identified three documents of interest to understanding Sir Maximilian Dallison's estate(s) prior to his death in 1631:
- C 2/ChasI/B11/22 Short title: Bishop of Bath and Wells v Dalyson. Plaintiff: Bishop of Bath and Wells. Defendant: Dalyson kt and others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. Between 1625 and 1660
- C 2/ChasI/B170/70 Short title: Bishop of Bath and Wells v Dallison. Plaintiff: Bishop of Bath and Wells. Defendant: Dallison and others. Document type: Replication. 1625-1660
- C 22/598/30 Bath & Wells, Bishop of v. Dallison. Between 1558 and 1714
- The Bishop of Bath and Wells is probably the former Bishop of Rochester, and this Chancery case is probably about Dallison's lease from the Bishop of Rochester
Thursday, 8th September 2011
Identified possible related document to C 3/429/50 and C 22/460/21: C 4/59/46 [-] and Thomas Stone v. [-] Hellinge: answer Date of document: Seventeenth century 1601 Jan 1 - 1700 Dec 31
Wednesday, 7th September 2011
Draft transcription completed for C 3/429/50 Stone v Dalison 1640-1642
Identified related document containing interogatories and depositions to be examined: C 22/460/21 Stone v. Dallison Between 1558 and 1714
Tuesday, 6th September 2011
Will of Charles Hoskins, Gentleman of Oxted, Surrey 27 January 1598 PROB 11/91 Lewyn 1 – 57
Will of Charles Hoskins of Oxted, Surrey 06 November 1657 PROB 11/269 Ruthen 411 – 461
Tuesday, 30th August 2011
C2/Eliz/D2/45 Dalison v Raynes Between 1558 and 1603
C2/Eliz/D6/57 Dalison v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603
C3/429/50 Stone v Dalison 1640-1642
C6/2/39 Dallyson v Maplesden 1641
C 10/65/38 Dalison v. Browne, Bush 1662
C 22/58/39 Dalyson v. Oxinder (sic) Between 1558 and 1714
NOT DOWNLOADED - C2/Eliz/D5/59 Max Dalison v John, lord bishop of Rochester XXXXX
NOT DOWNLOADED - C 9/232/127 Oxenden v. Midleton 1663
NOT DOWNLOADED - C 9/409/92 Oxenden v. Engham 1663
Thursday 18th August 2011
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653
Friday, 12th August 2011
C 9/49/48 Dalison v. Oxenden 1667
C 9/40/58 Oxenden v. Dallison 1668
C 9/240/194 Stanley v. Walsall 1650
C 10/14/38 William Cane v Barnabas Walsall and Thomas Stanley: Rochester, Kent 1651
C 10/57/109 Gore, Woodward and Meggs v. East India company, Governor & c. and others 1652
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx. 1664
C 114/69 Accounts (household and personal) correspondence (Dutch and French), Probate of will of Charles Marescoe, of London. Lawyer’s charges. Account books (Dutch and French): Middx
Tuesday, 9th August 2011
C 9/40/57 Oxenden v. Dallison and Stanley 1668
C 9/243/66 Dallison v. Skipper and Smith 1666
