Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/71 f.192r Annotate"

Revision as of 14:08, April 27, 2014

Image

Transcription

Current Transcription

<header>
<series>HCA 13/71</series>
<folio>f.192r</folio>
<picture>p1130541</picture>
<summary></summary>
<document-date></document-date>
<status>First cut transcription started on 22/11/12 and completed on 23/11/12 by Karen Gunnell; edited on 29/11/12 by Colin Greenstreet; pasted into wikispot and edited on 27/04/14 by Colin Greenstreet</status>
<first-transcriber>Karen Gunnell, 23/11/12</first-transcriber>
<document-start>

The same day Examined upon sayd allegation

3rd

John Luckes of Stepney in the County of Middlesex Mariners masters
mate, and formerly Gunner of the sayd shipp Mathew and John
aged 35 yeares or thereabouts sworne and examined saith

To the first and second articles of the sayd allegation This deponent saith That
the fish which was the voyage in question receyved on board the shipp
att Newfoundland for the accompt of the freighters was well and
sufficiently made by and cured before it was receyved on board
by the master and Company of the sayd shipp, And the same was so
cured and receyved on board in the moneth of August 1650 and not
before, and was afterwards in good order and condition delivered
in Spayne to the factors or Agents of the freighters All which
he knoweth to be true for that he was an eyewitnesse of the
premisses being Gunner of the sayd shipp the forsayd voyage

To the third article he saith he cannot depose

To the Crosse=Interrogatories [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first Interrogatory he saith it generally happens that some few fish
in such voyages come to be throwen overboard by some accidentall
dammage, and probably some few might so be throwen overboard the
voyage in question howbeit he this Rendent cannot positively
sweare that any were so throwne overboard att all. And further
otherwise than negatively he ćannot Answer

To the 2d. he saith he knoweth nothing thereof.

To the 3d. he saith the sayd shipp and the lading of the wynes upon
her returne from the Canaries for England were taken and lost
And otherwise of further he cannot answer.

To the 4th. he saith he did recover wages in this Court for the voyage
in question, but for how long tyme att present he remembered not.

John Love [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

Repeated before Doctor Godolphin with his precontest./.

****************************

The 14th of May 1656

Nathaniell Marriot against William Boutill}
and Thomas Jago: Smith}

Examined upon a libell given in and admitted on the
behalfe of the said Marriott./

Rp. EA. 2us

Roger Hill of the parish of Saint Edmund Lumbard
Streete London Mariner late Master of the Aprill
Shower lilate aged twenty eight yeares or thereabout
a witnes sworne and examined saith and deposeth
as followeth videlicet./

46. To the first article of the sayd libell hee saith the arlate Nathaniell Marriott
47. in the moneths of May June July and August in the yeare 1655 was
48. commonly accompted to bee the sole Owner and Proprietor of the arlate shipp
49. the Aprill shower, and did as sole Owner of her her tacke apparrell and furniture
some former and later voyages And he this deponent was present when the sayd Nathaneill Marriott did buy
and

Suggested links

HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner
HCA 3/47 Page Log & Planner