Difference between revisions of "HCA 3/47 WIKI CONVERSION"

Revision as of 07:51, May 2, 2015

Image

Transcription

<header>
<series>HCA 3/47</series>
<folio>f.36v-f.37r</folio>
<picture>CIMG2173</picture>
<summary></summary>
<document-date></document-date>
<status></status>
<first-transcriber></first-transcriber>
</header>

<document-start>
[f.36v]

<help>porrected</help> a premium <help>dorre tum</help> in writinge which
the Judges at his petition in paine etcetera each beinge
made by him of the truth of the contents thereof
accordinge to the information to him given which hee
beleeveth to bee no<help>t</help> admitted and decreed as in
the same is contained Then the said Smith in paine
etcetera <help>porrected</help> a bill of expences in writing which
the Judges did tax at the summe of six pounds and
tenne shillings and Smith made oath that his
clients have expended and are to expend the said
summe./

<margin value="Left">Ralph Stubb late owner of one}
eighth parte of the shippe the}
Scout against William Standen}
Colequite}</margin>
Which day appeared the said
Colequite for the said
Stubb and made himselfe
partie for him and alleadged
that William Standen and Company
owners of seaven eight parts of the
said shippe the Scout beinge long since
resolved to sett forth the said shippe upon a
voyage to sea did cause the said Stubb to bee
cited to appeare to contribute his proportionable
parte of the charge<help>s</help> in setting forth the said shippe or
els to show cause why the said shippe should not
bee repaired and sett to Sea att their owne charges
whoe not appearinge att the time prefixed nor by
himselfe or his proctor showinge any cause why the
said shippe should not bee repayred and sett to sea
att the charge of the said Standen and Company
The Court thereupon did order and decree the said
shipp to bee repaired ans sett to Sea att the proper
costs and charges of the said Standen and Company
they first giving securitie to the effect in the like
cases usuall And thereupon Mr Suckley proctor for
and on the behalfe of the said Stanon and William
Drakeford upon the second day of June 1654 produced
twoe sureties whoe became bound for the said
Standen and Drakeford in the summe of ffifty pounds
of lawfull money of England to the said Ralph Stubbs to
returne the said 8th parte of the said shipp the Scout
into the River of Thames within twelve monthes and
to submitt the same to the arrest of this Court or to
pay the value of the same accordinge to the appointment
thereof taken by authority of this Court in case the
same shall in the meane time miscarry or be cast away
Now forasmuch as the said twelve monthes are longe
since elapsed and the said shippe not returned as
aforesaid The Court at the petition of the said
Colequite did condemne the said Standon in the
value of the said eighth parte of the said shippe the
Scout accordinge to the said appointment amounting to
the summe of 19li 7s 3d to the said Ralph Stubb and
decreed him to bee monished to pay the same within
fourteene after daies after monition./.

<margin value="Bottom right, under main body of text, as lead to next page">George Gray</margin>

[f.37r]

<margin value="Left">George Gray ffrances Scot William}
Rowland James <help>Obord</help> and Henry}
Senbrea late marriners of the shipp}
the Seaflower against John Swan}
one of the said shippe Clements}
Suckley}</margin>
Which day appeared the proctors
and Councell on both sides
and the Judges having heard the
answers of the said Swan made
in this cause read and the
whole matter beinge argued and
debated did order and decree the
said Swan to pay and satisfy unto the
said ffrancis Scott William Rowland
James Obord and henry Seabrea their
respective monthly wages for their service in the
said shippe the voyage in question accordinge to the
respective rates mentioned in the schedule hereunder
written from the 26th day of June 1655 untill the
30th day of the month of August then next followinge
at which time the said shipp was imbargued by the
King of Spaine and to the said George Gray
his monthly wage schedulated for the time
aforesaid XX together with halfe pay for Twoe
monthes which the said Gray continued aboard
the said shipp the Seaflower after the time of
her said embargue and monished the said Swan to
pay the said wages accordingly by Satterday next./.

The schedule etcetera <note>CENTRE HEADING</note>
William Rowland 38s a month
James Oberd 38 s a month
George Gray 33s a month
Henry Seabrea 32s a month
ffrancis Scott 55s a month

<margin value="Left">Christopher Cooper and Company
owners of the vessell called the
Princesse of hull and Thomas
Wood owner of the goods in the
same against the shipp called the
Samuels Delight and against John
Breeze and all others etcetera</margin>
ffriday the 27th day of June
1656 before doctor Godolphin
in his chamber etcetera in the
presence of Samuel Howe
Notary publicke Appeared
personally edward Jackson of
the parish of Saint Margarett
Lothbury London merchant
and Nicholas Jackson of the parish
of Saint Antholins London merchant whoe
submittinge themselves etcetera obliged themselves
etcetera for the said Cooper and Company and
Wood in the summe of thirty pounds of lawfull
money of England to the said John Breeze to
prosecute the action in this behalfe commenced
against the said vessell called the Samuels
Delight and against the said Breeze and to pay the
exoences of suite in case the said Cooper and
Company and Wood shalbee overthrowne and to
bring forth the parties in judgement And unles etcetera
Which caution the Judge receaved./

<margin value="Bottom right, under main body of text, as lead to next page">Peter</margin>
</document-end>