Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/71 f.533v Annotate"

Revision as of 21:57, April 23, 2013 (view source) ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs)		Revision as of 16:42, December 15, 2013 (view source) ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	|Folio=533		|Folio=533
	|Side=Verso		|Side=Verso
−	|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 27/10/12 by Philip Hnatkovich; edited on 26/11/12 by Colin Greenstreet	+	|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 27/10/12 by Philip Hnatkovich; edited on 26/11/12 and 15/12/13 by Colin Greenstreet
	|First transcriber=Philip Hnatkovich		|First transcriber=Philip Hnatkovich
Line 15:		Line 15:
	|Transcription image=P1140236		|Transcription image=P1140236
−	|Transcription=<document-start>	+	|Transcription=giuen to understand) in the moneth of ffebruary 1654 And saith
−	1. giuen to understand) ......... in the moneth of ffebruary 1654 And saith	+	that hee this deponent did in the moneths of June or July 1655
−	2. that hee this deponent did in the moneths of June or July 1655	+	receive from the arlate Samuell Mathews Esquire twenty hogsheades
−	3. receive from the arlate Samuell Mathews Esquire twenty hogsheades	+	of tobaccoe laden aboard the sayd shipp the ''seaven Sisters'' And that hee
−	4. of tobaccoe laden aboard the sayd shipp the seaven Sisters And that hee	+	this deponent did in the moneth of August 1655 receave from the sayd
−	5. this deponent did in the moneth of August 1655 receave from the sayd	+	Mathews twenty other hogsheades of tobaccoe laden aboard the shipp
−	6. Mathews twenty ˹other˺ hogsheades of tobaccoe laden aboard the shipp	+	called the ''Charles'' of London which forty hogsheades of˺ tobaccoe as this deponent
−	7. called the Charles of London which ˹forty hogsheades of˺ tobaccoe as this deponent	+	verily beleeveth had bin shipped
−	8. ............................................... verily beleeveth had bin shipped	+	on board the sayd Ewers shipp if shee had come into Virginia
−	9. on board the sayd Ewers shipp if shee had come into Virginia	+	in due tyme as the other shipps did, but shee coming late thither
−	10. in due tyme as the other shipps did, but shee coming late thither	+	the sayd Tobaccoes was before her comming (as hee beleeveth) shipped
−	11. the sayd Tobaccoes was before her comming (as hee beleeveth) shipped	+	on board the ''Seaven Sisters'' and the Charles aforesayd although
−	12. on board the Seaven Sisters and the Charles aforesayd although	+	the arlate William Watts had (as this deponent hath heard
−	13. the arlate William Watts had (as this deponent hath heard	+	him saye) taken Tonnage for the same in the behalfe of the sayd
−	14. him saye) taken Tonnage for the same in the behalfe of the sayd	+	Mathews in the sayd Ewers his shipp, And further to these
−	15. Mathews in the sayd Ewers his shipp, And further to these	+	articles hee cannot depose./
−	16. articles hee cannot depose./	+
−	17. To the 14th hee cannot depose./	+	To the 14th hee cannot depose./
−	18. To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true/	+
−	19.	+	To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true/
−	20. To the Interrogatories now brought in/ CENTRE HEADING	+
−	21. To the first hee saith hee is neither of Kindred nor alliance to the	+	To the Interrogatories now brought in/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
−	22. producent Watts nor any way concerned in the freight in question	+
−	23. nor will it bee either profitt or preiudice to him which way soever it bee	+	To the first hee saith hee is neither of Kindred nor alliance to the
−	24. determined./	+	producent Watts nor any way concerned in the freight in question
−	25. To the 2 hee saith hee is noe Mariner nor can depose anything to this	+	23.
−	26. Interrogatorie	+	determined./
−	27. To the 3 hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contentes	+
−	28. thereof./	+	To the 2 hee saith hee is noe Mariner nor can depose anything to this
−	29. To the last hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contents	+	Interrogatorie
−	30. thereof more then what is expressed in his foregoeing deposition/	+
−	31. Repeated in Court before both	+	To the 3 hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contentes
−	32. Judges./	+	thereof./
−	33. James JenkinsSIGNATURE, RH SIDE	+
−	34.	+	To the last hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contents
−	35. The same day	+	thereof more then what is expressed in his foregoeing deposition/
−	36. Examined on the sayd allegation/	+
−	37. John Jefferis of Saint Clements Eastcheape London	+	Repeated in Court before both
−	38. ........ Merchant aged forty yeares or thereabouts	+	Judges./
−	39. a wittnes sworne and examined saith and deposeth	+
−	40. as followeth videlicet./	+	James Jenkins &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
−	41. To The first and second articles of the sayd allegation hee saith that one	+
−	42. Mr Morris and Mr Pelling searchers of Shipps at Gravesend did	+	<nowiki>***************************</nowiki>
−	43. informe this deponent the one of them by worde of mouth and the other	+
−	44. by letter that the arlate Phillipp Ewers his shipp was Cleered	+	The same day
−	45. (the voyage in question) at Gravesend on the eleventh day of december	+
−	46. one thousand sixe hundred fiftie fower and that shee was there	+	Examined on the sayd allegation/
−	47. <margin value="Bottom right, under main body of text, as lead to next page">cleered</margin>	+
−	</document-end>	+	'''John Jefferis''' of Saint Clements Eastcheape London
		+	Merchant aged forty yeares or thereabouts
		+	a wittnes sworne and examined saith and deposeth
		+	as followeth videlicet./
		+
		+	To The first and second articles of the sayd allegation hee saith that one
		+	Mr Morris and Mr Pelling searchers of Shipps at Gravesend did
		+	informe this deponent the one of them by worde of mouth and the other
		+	by letter that the arlate Phillipp Ewers his shipp was Cleered
		+	(the voyage in question) at Gravesend on the eleventh day of december
		+	one thousand sixe hundred fiftie fower and that shee was there
		+	cleered
		+
		+	|Primary sources='''TNA'''
		+
		+	<u>Chancery</u>
		+
		+
		+	C 6/147/13 Short title: Borre v Jefferies. Plaintiffs: Christian Borre. Defendants: John Jefferies, Richard Michelborne, John Pennell, John Currer, James Jenkins, Robert Earle and others. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. SFP. 1660
	|Suggested links=[[PhD Forum|PhD Forum]]		|Suggested links=[[PhD Forum|PhD Forum]]

---

Revision as of 16:42, December 15, 2013

Volume	HCA 13/71
Folio	533
Side	Verso
← Previous Page Next Page →
Status
First cut transcription started and completed on 27/10/12 by Philip Hnatkovich; edited on 26/11/12 and 15/12/13 by Colin Greenstreet
Languages
Note
none
First transcriber
Philip Hnatkovich
First transcribed
12/10/27
Editorial history
Created 23/04/13, by CSG

Image

P1140236

Transcription

giuen to understand) in the moneth of ffebruary 1654 And saith
that hee this deponent did in the moneths of June or July 1655
receive from the arlate Samuell Mathews Esquire twenty hogsheades
of tobaccoe laden aboard the sayd shipp the seaven Sisters And that hee
this deponent did in the moneth of August 1655 receave from the sayd
Mathews twenty other hogsheades of tobaccoe laden aboard the shipp
called the Charles of London which forty hogsheades of˺ tobaccoe as this deponent
verily beleeveth had bin shipped
on board the sayd Ewers shipp if shee had come into Virginia
in due tyme as the other shipps did, but shee coming late thither
the sayd Tobaccoes was before her comming (as hee beleeveth) shipped
on board the Seaven Sisters and the Charles aforesayd although
the arlate William Watts had (as this deponent hath heard
him saye) taken Tonnage for the same in the behalfe of the sayd
Mathews in the sayd Ewers his shipp, And further to these
articles hee cannot depose./

To the 14th hee cannot depose./

To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true/

To the Interrogatories now brought in/ [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first hee saith hee is neither of Kindred nor alliance to the
producent Watts nor any way concerned in the freight in question
23.
determined./

To the 2 hee saith hee is noe Mariner nor can depose anything to this
Interrogatorie

To the 3 hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contentes
thereof./

To the last hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contents
thereof more then what is expressed in his foregoeing deposition/

Repeated in Court before both
Judges./

James Jenkins [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

***************************

The same day

Examined on the sayd allegation/

John Jefferis of Saint Clements Eastcheape London
Merchant aged forty yeares or thereabouts
a wittnes sworne and examined saith and deposeth
as followeth videlicet./

To The first and second articles of the sayd allegation hee saith that one
Mr Morris and Mr Pelling searchers of Shipps at Gravesend did
informe this deponent the one of them by worde of mouth and the other
by letter that the arlate Phillipp Ewers his shipp was Cleered
(the voyage in question) at Gravesend on the eleventh day of december
one thousand sixe hundred fiftie fower and that shee was there
cleered

Sources

Primary sources

TNA

Chancery

C 6/147/13 Short title: Borre v Jefferies. Plaintiffs: Christian Borre. Defendants: John Jefferies, Richard Michelborne, John Pennell, John Currer, James Jenkins, Robert Earle and others. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. SFP. 1660

Suggested links

PhD Forum
PhD Forum Themes

HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner
HCA 3/47 Page Log & Planner

Topics