Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.512r Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Folio=512
 
|Folio=512
 
|Side=Recto
 
|Side=Recto
 +
|First transcriber=K.Gunnell
 +
 
|Editorial history=Created 29/08/14, by CSG
 
|Editorial history=Created 29/08/14, by CSG
  
Line 9: Line 11:
 
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0637.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.512r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
 
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0637.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.512r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
  
|Transcription=[INSERT DATA]
+
|Transcription=d:smith (LEFT H MARGIN)
 +
The same day
 +
Examined upon the sayd allegation.
 +
John Clarke of the parish of Stepney and County of Middlesex.
 +
Mariner a Quarter master of the Shipp Freeman aged 29 yeares or
 +
thereabouts a witness sworne and examined saith and deposeth as followeth
 +
vizt
 +
To the first second and third articles of the sayd allegation hee saith and deposeth that
 +
the shipp the Freeman being goeing downe towards gravesend with the benefitt of
 +
a smale gale of winde and the arlate shipp the Mary coming up towards London with
 +
the benefitt of the tyde of Fludd the Company of the Freemand (for that their shipp
 +
was a shipp of good burthen of about five hundred tonnes and did drawe about sixteene
 +
foote water and held goods in her to a very considerable value and was as neere the South
 +
shoare of the Thames as conveniently she could goe without goeing aground and
 +
perceiving the shipp Mary to make towards them did call out to the company of the
 +
Mary (while the Mary was at a good distance off yet soe neere that the company
 +
might very well heare what was sayd unto them) and desyred them to put their sayd
 +
shipp astayes which they might easily have done if they pleased and told them if they did not soe doe shee would runne on board the
 +
Freeman or words to that effect which not withstanding the master and Company of
 +
the Mary gave noe answere that this deponent heard but braced their mayne topp
 +
sayles a back stayes and put their helme a weather and by that meanes ranne
 +
their sayd shipp directly athwart the hawser of the Freeman which they
 +
did in a negligent and carelessse manner as he believeth  soe that they might if they
 +
had pleased easily have  avoided falling fowle of the Freeman by putting their sayd
 +
shipp a stayes or steereing her a little more northerly (the Freeman being as neere
 +
the South shoare as she could conveniently toe being a shipp of good burthen) and the Mary being a
 +
smale shipp and having the greatest part of the Thames to have gone cleere of the
 +
Freenman if her company had pleased soe to have shaped her course
 +
soe that the damage contraversed happened only though the fault of the company of the Mary and not any
 +
fault of the company of the Freeman as hee verily believeth and is perswaded in his conscience (LEFT H MARGIN)
 +
[and] deposeth being an eye witness and one of the Company of and aboard the Freeman
 +
when the premissed happened And further cannot depose.
 +
To the 4th hee saith he knoweth not that any of the compnay of the Freeman did cut any
 +
of the tackle of the Mary but saith if any were cut hee believeth the same was soe cut
 +
in order to the preservation of the Freeman and her ladeing form being driven on shoare
 +
by the Mary And further he cannot depose.
 +
To the last hee saith saving his foregoeing deposition to the 1:2 and 3 artlcile to which
 +
hee referreth hee cannot depose.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[INSERT DATA]
  
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 20:04, October 26, 2014

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.




Purpose

This page is for the annotation of HCA 13/70 f.512r.

Annotations can be viewed by everyone on a read-only basis.

For more information on MarineLives and the MarineLives Annotation Project read our Shipping News blog entries:

Annotating Marine Lives, May 1st 2013
Adding value to primary documents, May 8th 2013
Witnesses in Court, 1657-1658 (May 9th, 2013)




Registration to annotate documents

Registration is required to contribute annotations to this page and to other pages in the wiki.

You can register using the following Form, and we will issue you with a UserName and Password for the wiki.




Text formatting

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.




Adding footnotes

  • Go into edit mode
  • Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
  • Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
  • Save the page


For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

  • ''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>




Suggested links

Annotate HCA 13/64 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/65 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/68 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/69 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/70 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/71 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/72 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/73 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/74 Volume Page
Marine Lives Tools

Image

HCA 13/70 f.512r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

d:smith (LEFT H MARGIN)
The same day
Examined upon the sayd allegation.
John Clarke of the parish of Stepney and County of Middlesex.
Mariner a Quarter master of the Shipp Freeman aged 29 yeares or
thereabouts a witness sworne and examined saith and deposeth as followeth
vizt
To the first second and third articles of the sayd allegation hee saith and deposeth that
the shipp the Freeman being goeing downe towards gravesend with the benefitt of
a smale gale of winde and the arlate shipp the Mary coming up towards London with
the benefitt of the tyde of Fludd the Company of the Freemand (for that their shipp
was a shipp of good burthen of about five hundred tonnes and did drawe about sixteene
foote water and held goods in her to a very considerable value and was as neere the South
shoare of the Thames as conveniently she could goe without goeing aground and
perceiving the shipp Mary to make towards them did call out to the company of the
Mary (while the Mary was at a good distance off yet soe neere that the company
might very well heare what was sayd unto them) and desyred them to put their sayd
shipp astayes which they might easily have done if they pleased and told them if they did not soe doe shee would runne on board the
Freeman or words to that effect which not withstanding the master and Company of
the Mary gave noe answere that this deponent heard but braced their mayne topp
sayles a back stayes and put their helme a weather and by that meanes ranne
their sayd shipp directly athwart the hawser of the Freeman which they
did in a negligent and carelessse manner as he believeth soe that they might if they
had pleased easily have avoided falling fowle of the Freeman by putting their sayd
shipp a stayes or steereing her a little more northerly (the Freeman being as neere
the South shoare as she could conveniently toe being a shipp of good burthen) and the Mary being a
smale shipp and having the greatest part of the Thames to have gone cleere of the
Freenman if her company had pleased soe to have shaped her course
soe that the damage contraversed happened only though the fault of the company of the Mary and not any
fault of the company of the Freeman as hee verily believeth and is perswaded in his conscience (LEFT H MARGIN)
[and] deposeth being an eye witness and one of the Company of and aboard the Freeman
when the premissed happened And further cannot depose.
To the 4th hee saith he knoweth not that any of the compnay of the Freeman did cut any
of the tackle of the Mary but saith if any were cut hee believeth the same was soe cut
in order to the preservation of the Freeman and her ladeing form being driven on shoare
by the Mary And further he cannot depose.
To the last hee saith saving his foregoeing deposition to the 1:2 and 3 artlcile to which
hee referreth hee cannot depose.


[INSERT DATA]