Difference between revisions of "MRP: Testing the wiki"
From MarineLives
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
* What templates would you like to see available to help you contribute to the wiki? | * What templates would you like to see available to help you contribute to the wiki? | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ==Academic apparatus== | ||
| + | ===Foot notes=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Have you found the footnotes of appropriate length and content? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Do you believe that the purpose and nature footnotes in web based material edited to academic standards should be different from that of printed material? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Do you find it useful to have electronic links from footnotes in this wiki to: | ||
| + | |||
| + | (a) wiki articles (such as biographical profiles and profiles of places)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | (b) transcribed primary documents on this wiki? | ||
| + | |||
| + | (c) e-published books outside this wiki? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Are you comfortable with the URL of external e-resources to be concealed under an English language name for the resource (with the URL viewable in edit mode, but not print mode)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Do you support this wiki's current policy of preferring the Internet Archive e-book reader over the Google e-book reader, where there is a choice for the same edition? | ||
---- | ---- | ||
==Primary source content== | ==Primary source content== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Would you be interested in contributing primary material, as the initial transcriber of a wiki posted document, or as a subsequent contributor to that document in the form of context, annotations, and suggested primary and secondary sources? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * What sort of authorial acknowledgement is appropriate for primary material? For the transcribing contributor, and for subsequent contributors and editors of a specific new primary document? | ||
| + | ---- | ||
===Legal=== | ===Legal=== | ||
| Line 66: | Line 90: | ||
- Currently the transcriptions vary considerably in the degree to which annotations and contextual notes have been provided | - Currently the transcriptions vary considerably in the degree to which annotations and contextual notes have been provided | ||
| + | |||
| + | - See [[MRP: Chancery cases|Chancery cases]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 95: | Line 121: | ||
* What type of secondary material would you like to see on the wiki? | * What type of secondary material would you like to see on the wiki? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Would you be interested in contributing secondary material, as the initial author of a wiki article, or as a subsequent contributor to that article, or editor of that article? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * What sort of authorial acknowledgement is appropriate for secondary material? For the initial or primary author, and for subsequent contributor and editors? | ||
To date the focus of this wiki has been to prepare, post, annotate and cross-link new primary documents. | To date the focus of this wiki has been to prepare, post, annotate and cross-link new primary documents. | ||
Revision as of 08:58, January 5, 2012
Testing the wiki
Editorial history
16/12/11, CSG: Created page
Contents
Look & feel
Front page
- Is it clear who the wiki is for?
- Is it clear what the wiki is about?
- Are you encouraged to explore further?
Font size
- Are headers and subheaders the right size?
- Is body text the right size at the standard browser and screen resolution you use?
Images
- Are images sized appropriately?
- Do you prefer fixed size images embedded within the text, or images viewable in popup windows in which the images can be resized?
Functionality
Search
- What has been your experience of the search functionality in this wiki?
- What search functionality would you like to see?
- Is it clear how to get where you want to get?
- Is browsing encouraged as well as focused research?
- Is it clear what navigation are available and how to use them?
Finding tools
- What finding tools have you found useful in this wiki?
- What finding tools would you like to see?
Editing
- Is it clear how to edit a page?
- Have you experience of editing a wiki or a website?
Use of Templates
- What templates would you like to see available to help you contribute to the wiki?
Academic apparatus
Foot notes
- Have you found the footnotes of appropriate length and content?
- Do you believe that the purpose and nature footnotes in web based material edited to academic standards should be different from that of printed material?
- Do you find it useful to have electronic links from footnotes in this wiki to:
(a) wiki articles (such as biographical profiles and profiles of places)?
(b) transcribed primary documents on this wiki?
(c) e-published books outside this wiki?
- Are you comfortable with the URL of external e-resources to be concealed under an English language name for the resource (with the URL viewable in edit mode, but not print mode)?
- Do you support this wiki's current policy of preferring the Internet Archive e-book reader over the Google e-book reader, where there is a choice for the same edition?
Primary source content
- Would you be interested in contributing primary material, as the initial transcriber of a wiki posted document, or as a subsequent contributor to that document in the form of context, annotations, and suggested primary and secondary sources?
- What sort of authorial acknowledgement is appropriate for primary material? For the transcribing contributor, and for subsequent contributors and editors of a specific new primary document?
Legal
- Do the Chancery transcriptions stand by themselves, or would they benefit from greater annotation and contextual notes?
- Currently the transcriptions vary considerably in the degree to which annotations and contextual notes have been provided
- See Chancery cases
Inventories
- How would you like to see inventories displayed?
See Inventories
Letters
- Is the format used to display individual letters a helpful one?
- Are short or more discursive footnotes appropriate and useful in a wiki format?
See Correspondence of Sir George Oxenden, 1663-1669 (British Library, Add. MSS. 40708-40713)
See Letters
Wills
- Are contextual notes useful?
- Is there any point in a light abstract of a will?
See Wills
Secondary material content
- What type of secondary material would you like to see on the wiki?
- Would you be interested in contributing secondary material, as the initial author of a wiki article, or as a subsequent contributor to that article, or editor of that article?
- What sort of authorial acknowledgement is appropriate for secondary material? For the initial or primary author, and for subsequent contributor and editors?
To date the focus of this wiki has been to prepare, post, annotate and cross-link new primary documents.
There has been some limited experimentation with new wiki articles, which synthesise new primary research and which provide finding aids to unused or lightly used primary sources
Sample articles can be found in the wiki, especially for:
- Places
- People
