Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/71 f.203v Annotate"

Latest revision as of 11:53, September 23, 2018

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.

Adding footnotes

Go into edit mode
Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
Save the page

For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>

Image

HCA 13/71 f.203v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

To the Interrogatories/ [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in
the cause on behalfe of the producent being required soe to doe by the foresayd
Captaine Bowden and hath receaved nothing for his paines nor is concerned
in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively/

To the 2 hee cannot depose/

To the 3 saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot answere/

To the 4th hee cannot depose./

To the 5th hee cannot depose/

To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like
effect) hee cannot answere and knoweth nothing thereof And to the rest
of the Interrogatorie hee answereth negatively./

John Bennetland [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

*****************************

The same day

Examined on the sayd allegation

Rp. 4

Robert de Luna of London Merchant aged 32 yeares
or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and examined saith and
deposeth as followeth videlicet./

To the 6th article of the sayd allegation and the schedule therein mentioned
hee saith hee hath knowne the arlate Trenchpaine for about these
fowerteene yeares last past and hath receaved divers letters letters from
him and had correspondence with him in way of merchandizing and
thereby is well acquainted with his hand writeing, and having
perused the schedule in the sayd article mentioned hee saith by virtue
of his oath that hee is persuaded in his conscience and verily beleeveth
the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writing And
further to this article hee cannot depose./

To the rest hee is not examined by direction of the producents
proctor

To the Interrogatories./ [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the
truth of his knowledge being required soe to doe (as hee remembreth
by one Mr Thomas Papillion a merchant on behalfe of the producent
and hath receaved nothing for his testimony nor expecteth any thing, nor
is concerned in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively

To the 2 hee cannot depose./

To the 3 hee cannot depose/

To the 4th hee cannot depose/

To the 5th hee saith hee hath heard that after the ladeing of the
goods in question on board the Morlaix Merchant the Interrogate
Trenchpaine fayled in his Estate And further to this Interrogatorie hee
cannot depose./

To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like effect)
hee cannot depose knowing nothing thereof And to the rest of the Interrogatorie hee
answereth negatively./

Repeated in Court before both Judges./

Robert DeLuna [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

Topics

People

Robert de Luna

Sources

Primary sources

TNA

Chancery

C 5/111/24 Short title: Hicks v Bullock. Plaintiffs: Francis Hicks. Defendants: Robert Bullock, and others. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Robert De Luna, London. Document type: bill, two answers. 1694
C 5/525/20 Short title: Molyne v De Luna. Plaintiffs: Abraham Molyne. Defendants: Robert de Luna and Elizabeth de Luna his wife. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: Bill, two answers. 1673

C 6/129/239 Short title: Winstanley v Burrell. Plaintiffs: Edward Winstanley. Defendants: Samuel Burrell, John Limbrey, Richard Love, Robert Deluna and Elizabeth Deluna his wife. Subject: property in Wisbech, Cambridgeshire. Document type: three answers, schedule.

C 10/494/85 De Luna v. Lamplugh: Middx. 1676

C 22/724/35 Wingfeild v. De Luna. 01 January 1558 - 31 December 1714

PROB

PROB 11/390/105 Will of Robert De Luna, Merchant of Cheshunt, Hertfordshire. 31 January 1688
PROB 11/420/29 Will of Elizabeth De Luna, Widow of Edmonton, Middlesex. 03 May 1694

Status
Volume	HCA 13/71
Folio	203
Side	Verso
← Previous Page Next Page →
Uploaded image; transcribed on 01/11/2012
Languages

Note
IMAGE: P1130564.JPG
First transcriber
Colin Greenstreet
First transcribed
2012/11/01
Editorial history
Edited on 14/12/2013 by Colin Greenstreet

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 perused the schedule in the sayd article mentioned hee saith by virtue
 of his oath that hee is persuaded in his conscience and verily beleeveth
-the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writng And
+the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writing And
 further to this article hee cannot depose./