Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/71 f.199r Annotate"

Revision as of 19:40, April 28, 2014 (view source) ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:46, April 28, 2014 (view source) ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs) m Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:
	}}{{PageHelp}}		}}{{PageHelp}}
	{{PageTranscription		{{PageTranscription
−	|Transcription=1. <margin value="Left">A.13.</margin>	+	|Transcription='''A.13.'''
−	2. This first of May 1656/	+
−	3. <margin value="Left">Tytus Complayne CSG: TITUS COMPLAYNE IS THE PLAINTIFF against John Brandlin)	+	This first of May 1656/
−	4. John Blomfeidle and Alexander Scott)</margin>	+
−	5. Examined upon the libell giuen in and admitted on behalfe of	+	Tytus Complayne CSG: TITUS COMPLAYNE IS THE PLAINTIFF against John Brandlin&#125;
−	6. the sayd Complaine	+	John Blomfeidle and Alexander Scott&#125;
−	Doctor XXXX  GUTTER	+
		+	Examined upon the libell giuen in and admitted on behalfe of
		+	the sayd Complaine
		+	Doctor &#91;XXXX  GUTTER&#93;
	'''7'''		'''7'''

---

Revision as of 19:46, April 28, 2014

Volume	HCA 13/71
Folio	199
Side	Recto
← Previous Page Next Page →
Status
First cut transcription completed by Laura Seymour, 18/09/12; first edit started by Colin Greenstreet, 24/09/12 (up to line 10); further edits on 03/11/12 by Colin Greenstreet; pasted into wikispot on 27/04/14 by Colin Greenstreet
Languages
Note
none
First transcriber
Laura Seymour
First transcribed
12/09/18
Editorial history
Created 05/04/14, by CSG

Image

Transcription

A.13.

This first of May 1656/

Tytus Complayne CSG: TITUS COMPLAYNE IS THE PLAINTIFF against John Brandlin}
John Blomfeidle and Alexander Scott}

Examined upon the libell giuen in and admitted on behalfe of
the sayd Complaine
Doctor [XXXX GUTTER]

7

Thomas Coclough of the parish of Saint Christoper neere the stocks
London Grocer agede ˹36 or 37 or eight˺ yere or therabout, a wittnes sworne and
examined saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet

11. To the 3 article of the sayd Libell hee saith that upon the thirteenth day of
12. the moneth of October 1653 the arlate Titus Complayne did buy of
13. this deponent the foure hogsheads of tobaccoe arlate, for which the sayd Comp-
14. laine dide bargaine with this deponent to pay him for them and hath since
15. paid him for them fifty, five pounds foure shillings seauen pence and
16. the sayde Complaine ordered this deponent to send the sayd foure hogsheads
17. of tobacco to dice Key London to be shipped a board the key a vessell called
18. the Primrose of Ipswich of which ee hee sayd the arlate William Marsh
19. was Master and hee saith that shortly after they were soo bought and before
20. the seventeenth day of the sayde moneth of March this deponent sent them in a
21. Cart to dice Key and sent his seruant John Appleton with them to see
22. them deliuered to the sayd Marth, who accordingly went with them and
23. receaued the sayd hogsheads of tobaccoe at the sayde Key, and taken charge of
24. them till such tyme as he could shipp them with his sayd vessell. And hee
25. saith a goode while after the sayd moneth of October this deponent heareing
26. a reporte that the sayde Marsh his hoye was cast away, hee this deponent
27. went to the wharfengers man of dice Key and enquireth of him whether the
28. sayde 4 hogsheads of tobaccoe were by the sayde Marsh laden aboard his sayd
29. hoye, who affirmed to this deponent that they were laden aboard her
30. about the 17th day of the sayde moneth of October 1653 And further to
31. this article hee cannot depose./

32. To the 4th hee cannot depose./

33. To the 5th hee saith hee hath hearde the sayd Complaine[ant] saye that hee
34. nor any other for him or his use did euer pp receiue of the saud Marsh the sayd
35. 4 hogsheads of tobaccoe or any thing in liew of them And further hee
36. cannot depose. saving his subsequent deposition

37. To the rest of the articles 6th and 7th hee cannot depose/

38. To the 8th hee cannot depose

39. To the rest of the articles hee is not examined by direcc[ti]on of the producent

To the Interrogatories [CENTRE HEADING]

41. To the first Interrogatory hee saith hee has cometh to testifie he hath of the
42. knowledge in this cause being soo required to doe by the sayd Complaine[ant]
43. and saith it will bee neither profitt nor preiudice to him this rendent
44. which way soo ever his cause bee adiudged and that hee hath noe share or
45. interest therein nor in the vessell Interrogate./

46. To the 2 he saith hee knoweth not the Interrate Brandling nor euer sawe
47. him that he knoweth of./

48. To the 3 hee cannot answere knowing nothing touching the contents thereof/

49. To

Topics

People

Thomas Colclough

"COLCLOUGH, Thomas

Co Co Cornhill, 1660-71, Dep, 1665 (1) 'The Crown', near Stocks market, Cornhill, 1664, gone by 1677, St Christopher, 1644, 1660, St Olave Hart Street, 1680 (2) GR, appr, 1637, to Thomas GOWER (3) b 1619, d 31 Dec 1680, bur St Olave Hart Street (4) Will PCC 56 North pr, 8 Apr 1681 f George Colclough of Blurton, Staff, gent, mar 1644, Elizabeth Gooday (5) "Cousin" of George GOODAY (6)

(1) Dep, 1664-71 in CRO lists, 1665 only in WIM, Cornhill (2) LTR, V, p 154, Boyd 43081, VBk, St Christopher, will (3) Will, GR, Appr Reg, 1629-66, f 66 (4) Boyd 43081 (5) GR, Appr Reg, 1629-66, f 66, 43081 (6) Will"^[1]

Suggested links

HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner

HCA 3/47 Page Log & Planner

1. ↑ J.R.. Woodhead, 'Cade - Cutler', The Rulers of London 1660-1689: A biographical record of the Aldermen and Common Councilment of the City of London (1966), pp. 42-56, viewed 28/04/14